@ausdiv I'll take their explanation, considering you struggle to spell or construct a coherent sentence, over yours any day. You couldn't make a 3D model based upon the NIST report as you don't have the expertise or ability to interpret the report, try as you might. Only someone who puts "div" in their username and doesn't realise what they have done can come up with a theory that an aircraft disappeared into thin air and something else made a big hole in a building it was flying towards.
@wierdwesterner are you personally attached to the official explanation, like what is your problem, im not allowed to present my opinion? I have actually done the maths on it myself, i have read and examinedd the nist report and found there to be flaws in it, i have made a 3d model in cad based on the measurements provided in the nist report and the plane that was reported to have hit the building could not have according to these facts, opinion backed by fact im not here to argue with you.
@ausdiv I'm not your friend. On the contrary, all of the evidence that has been presented concurs with the official federal explanation. Perhaps you should try to prove what DID hit the pentagon, if Flight 77 didn't and why it made a hole the shape and size of an airliner fuselage in it, as at the moment you are trying to tell me that 2 plus 2 definitely equals five since there is no definite evidence that it equals four. Good luck with that.
@wierdwesterner it can be easily proven that it didnt, if you check the mathematics on the NIST report, the impact marks on the building, the official approach angle, the size of the so called plane, it does not add up my friend.
Ever heard of sleight of hand? Where a magician creates a distraction while he performs a trick. A large low plane would capture everybodies attention as a missile shoots into the Pentagon. Then one witness says, 'i saw a plane hit the pentagon' (even though they didnt see the impact). Other witnesses follow the leader, then there you have it, histor written. 'A plane hit the Pentagon' BS
Another hijacked plane is 20 minutes outside washington d.c wow news gets around fast! and yet they have the calm presence of mind to still conduct the interview...so staged it's not funny 20 minutes and not a single intercept of a hijacked plane...
And last time i checked we still have 2 oceans to protect us, and still Iraq, IRAN, AFGHANITAN had no means to balisticaly hit the USA .liars .
@ausdiv I'll take their explanation, considering you struggle to spell or construct a coherent sentence, over yours any day. You couldn't make a 3D model based upon the NIST report as you don't have the expertise or ability to interpret the report, try as you might. Only someone who puts "div" in their username and doesn't realise what they have done can come up with a theory that an aircraft disappeared into thin air and something else made a big hole in a building it was flying towards.
wierdwesterner 7 months ago
@wierdwesterner are you personally attached to the official explanation, like what is your problem, im not allowed to present my opinion? I have actually done the maths on it myself, i have read and examinedd the nist report and found there to be flaws in it, i have made a 3d model in cad based on the measurements provided in the nist report and the plane that was reported to have hit the building could not have according to these facts, opinion backed by fact im not here to argue with you.
ausdiv 7 months ago
@ausdiv I'm not your friend. On the contrary, all of the evidence that has been presented concurs with the official federal explanation. Perhaps you should try to prove what DID hit the pentagon, if Flight 77 didn't and why it made a hole the shape and size of an airliner fuselage in it, as at the moment you are trying to tell me that 2 plus 2 definitely equals five since there is no definite evidence that it equals four. Good luck with that.
wierdwesterner 7 months ago
@wierdwesterner it can be easily proven that it didnt, if you check the mathematics on the NIST report, the impact marks on the building, the official approach angle, the size of the so called plane, it does not add up my friend.
ausdiv 7 months ago
@ausdiv prove that it didn't!
wierdwesterner 7 months ago
@wierdwesterner well it sure didnt go into that building Einstein. do some more research before you go running your mouth
ausdiv 7 months ago
@ausdiv So where did the plane go then genius? Is it in somebody's top hat?
wierdwesterner 7 months ago
Ever heard of sleight of hand? Where a magician creates a distraction while he performs a trick. A large low plane would capture everybodies attention as a missile shoots into the Pentagon. Then one witness says, 'i saw a plane hit the pentagon' (even though they didnt see the impact). Other witnesses follow the leader, then there you have it, histor written. 'A plane hit the Pentagon' BS
ausdiv 1 year ago
Another hijacked plane is 20 minutes outside washington d.c wow news gets around fast! and yet they have the calm presence of mind to still conduct the interview...so staged it's not funny 20 minutes and not a single intercept of a hijacked plane...
And last time i checked we still have 2 oceans to protect us, and still Iraq, IRAN, AFGHANITAN had no means to balisticaly hit the USA .liars .
realistromeo 4 years ago
ww. serendipity. li/wot/other_fires/other_fires. htm
codevictim 4 years ago