Dr. George Carlo, Chairman Of The Wireless Technology Research Program

Qlink Pendant : http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html
Qlink Pendant Reviews: http://www.emfnews.org/testimonials.html
Home Radiation Protection : http://www.emfnews.org/earthcalm_emf_protection.html

More complex measures would be to have system compatibility and planned infrastructure roll out. With our Business As Usual attitude this may no longer be possible. Instead of creating the false siting restrictions based on appearance, we should have based it on health. Antennas should be sited where they will do the least harm and anyone who is in a EMF/RFR hot spot should be compensated in some way.

Shielding or relocating would both help. The best way to avoid intended and unintended RFR is to install fiber optics as the system has no RFR emissions. Instead of adopting these measures, the injured are left to their own devices. Industry has done its best to label the people they have harmed as being crazy.

In addition to the above measures, Dr. George Carlo, chairman of the Wireless Technology Research program (WTR) from 1993 -- 1999, a $28.5 million research program, funded by the cellular phone industry that investigated the possible health effects of cellular phones wrote in a recent article in the American Trial Lawyer that: "Laws should be enacted to place health warnings on cell phones and wireless devices, as well as warning signs in public spaces that carry WiFi and other wireless signals.

The Telecommunications Act must be amended to include victims' compensation provisions; incentives for the development and commercialization of technologies to [protect] users from harmful electromagnetic radiation; and civil rights provisions to promote environmental and health risk protection for homeowners in communities where cell phone base stations and other wireless infrastructure are constructed."

It is imperative that the U.S. government reexamines our RFR exposure level and adjusts it to protect populations from having their health adversely impacted by RFR exposure. The Telecommunication's Act of 1996 needs to be revised to allow local oversight and health concerns as part of the criteria for antenna siting.

The Coalition for Local Oversight of Utility Technologies is working on this effort here in the U.S. I urge you to get involved and advocate for lower RFR exposure standards. Please go to www.cloutnow.org to find out how you can get involved in this important work.

http://www.emfnews.org/mret-technology-how-it-works.html
Cell Phone Radiation Dangers : http://www.emfnews.org/products.html

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Wireless Technology Research
• Qlink Pendant Reviews
• Pendant Testimonial
• Q-link Protection Reviews
• Computer Radiation Protection
• Cell Phone Usage
• EMF Protection
• Wireless Radiation
• Cell Phone Radiation
• qlink pendant
• emf protection
• qlink scam
• qlink review
• qlink scooter
• qlink
• qlink bracelet
• qlink golf