Fox's Jesse Watters to TP: "Watch my blazer, bro"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
118,587
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 11, 2011

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 31 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Watters destroyed this liberal clown.

  • Treating the cameraman like shit for being a fucking geed. TFM.

see all

All Comments (269)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @NYyankees722vids That video you linked proves why Bill sticks to editing his interviews. He got his ass handed to him by lardass-treehugging-michael-mo­therfucking Moore. "Now you're branching off to a whole different zone." How? This all started by me calling Jesse Watters a douche. YOU KNOW the only reason you were so quick to defend him was because he plays on your team. "C'mon bro, you're starting to sound a little JV my bro." <- you're defending this guy

  • @neumdizzle how about this moderately infamous interview? youtube.com/watch?v=trOdCU6aZO­g | Wtf are you even talking about? "partisan goggles, real facts, talking points"? What does that have to do with this video? Now you're branching off to a whole different zone.When O'Reilly says they're unedited, he'll tell you.Some of it may normally be for time or non-importance. Either way, the entire interview is posted online by him.Again, when said. Some people prefer ignorance and that's your choice.

  • @NYyankees722vids"Clearly you rarely, if ever, watch the Factor, you tool." Believe it or not, I love watching Fox news, it has to be the most entertaining news channel. The idea that Bill O'Reilly doesn't edit or doctor his interviews is shit-your-pants retarded. Judging from this argument, I honestly believe that you are somewhat educated, so there is hope. I think its time to take your partisan goggles off and start embracing real facts and real news as opposed to twisted talking points.

  • @neumdizzle I don't understand why it's so hard for you to figure it out... you clearly have something against FNC, Watters, or O'Reilly.

  • @neumdizzle Ambushes are usually done by a handful of people, not an "army" of one. That's a fact, not my opinion. Your logic of "ITS AN AMBUSH BCUZ WATTERS DOES IT" is idiotic. Watters "ambushes" people who say something stupid, so he wants an explanation from something THEY said. What the tool in the video is saying doesn't directly relate to Watters, like Watters' ambushes (ex. Max Waters). Again, Watters tries to get answers out of people from what they said, unlike this tool.

  • @neumdizzle Ron Paul wouldn't go on the Factor because "he wasn't really a journalist". He doesn't like O'Reilly's style of interviewing. Bill explicitly says he leaves the interviews unedited, and you'll see it. Clearly you rarely, if ever, watch the Factor, you tool. If I say something's a fact, it's a actual fact not an opinion. I didn't just pull it out of my ass like you just did. "Ambush: A surprise attack by people lying in wait in a concealed position", which is often used in warfare.

  • @NYyankees722vids ok sorry for keeping you waiting. Ron Paul wouldn't go on O'reilly because he undoubtedly knew the interview would be doctored/edited. I like how you label your opinions "facts". Heres a fact for you: it is an ambush because he is using Watters' SAME TACTIC and thats by using the element of suprise. He's trying to get a blurted out answer or soundbite from an unprepared individual by asking slanderous questions.

  • @neumdizzle Nothing will stop Ron Paul from speaking, but nevertheless, he said he wouldn't go on the Factor (assuming you're referring to that journalist video). No one is criticizing the guy for doing an ambush, which wasn't even an ambush. It was a complete failure;you know that. With the word "ambush" you think of at least a handful of people. It's more credible than some blogger whipping out his cell phone. It just looks silly and pointless. You think whatever you want, just know the facts.

  • @neumdizzle It's not about having an "expensive" crew, it's about having a crew-- one that's legitimate. Even a bunch of high schoolers could have done a better job. Calling someone a douchebag because they don't want to answer a question is idiotic. Congresswoman Waters, as you saw, didn't even open her mouth yet I don't consider her a douche. I could only assume you use that word a lot, so it's nothing new. You claimed Watters' ambushees answered his questions, I proved they all didn't.

  • @NYyankees722vids You're an intellectual powerhouse

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more