Evolution In 5 Minutes

(cont) Mutations are not modifications, mutations are the errors of genes. If you believe mutations are modifications, then you my lost friend are a fool. We see, cleverly designed structures, as Dawkins would put it..."It looks designed, but it's not." See, that's his atheism talking. It looks designed, because it is designed.

Ah, yes, the same way a stereo can be put in the same family tree as a phone,they both have speakers, yet, they are each designed accordingly for their purpose, so ASSUME that they MUST be descendants or evolved from one another is just that an assumption, without physically observing the change. Yes, but you're assuming that we descended from them, I say common design. Yes, and it was an weak explanation, since that does not prove Darwinian Evolution. Mutations are not modifications, (cont)

@Lichtspielhaus234
The similarity in the DNA is in such a way that there can be put up a family tree.

The DNA similarities are that of relation, not just "similar".

And I have already explained to you before about the junk DNA, recessive genes and such.
In the end, all you can say is "god did it that way", well, then that proves retarded designer.
What we see is modification in organisms, not some cleverly designed structure.

Now, you feel the need to add your 2 cents? I see. Well, if you call "evidence" similarities in the fossil record and DNA, then that's poor evidence, because it's an assumption. No, I have not, dug up "wacky conspiracy theories" You're too trusting of the establishment in power. You haven't proven me wrong, because I have not said a thing, I'm questioning the validity of the "evidence". No, I do not go on yelling at someone else, they just intrude. Question, why isn't it common design?

@Lichtspielhaus234
Actually, no.
It is you who is "nuh-uh".

We have all presented evidence.
And over and over again, you go "nuh-uh" and dig up some wacky conspiracy theories.
When you are, in fact, proven wrong, you simply ignore what is said and go on yelling at someone else.

The Museum of Natural History even admitted that they had bones from different animals put together to form dinosaurs, LUCY is made up of monkey and human bones. You have millions of fossils of animals that were alive and now dead, that is all, and you can't even explain the Cambrian explosion. You're still missing the "missing link."

Well actually ... Nah can't be bothered, you've made your mind, theres really no point. I'm bored of you too.

I'm bored with people who base their whole life on an assumption, without evidence, that they say is out there.

I'm not debating Global Warming, you're saying it's happening, and I disagree, so, if you want to debate it, then you go, all I am saying is that if they lied about that, what else are they lying to us about? Also, the claims they make that prove Global Warming are the same claims you people make to support evolution. You know there is no lying how? How do you know their not falsifying the evidence? No, the fakes are still there, that's why you're still looking for the "missing link."

Um, actually, the earth goes through these periods of cooling and warming, but their claiming that it's caused by man, now, Al Gore, has refused interviews, and why? Because he lied, the data was all a lie. Oh evolution is not because these scientists tell you it's true and you believe them? I see, yet, you don't know their motives. "Conspiracy" ? I never said anything about a conspiracy, it's called, favoritism. Do some research.