12 Rationalizing action-at-a-Distance

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
19,807
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 30, 2008

http://www.lulu.com/content/7436620

http://www.amazon.com/Why-God-Doesnt-Exist-ebook/dp/B002IPHCME

http://youstupidrelativist.com/WGDE.html

http://youstupidrelativist.com/01Math/04Grav/03AAAD.html

General Relativity sweeps the troublesome Mach's Principle under the rug and has no explanation for the complex units of the gravitational constant G.

On the other hand, the rope hypothesis justifies Mach's Principle and at least two factors of the gravitational constant.

http://www.youstupidrelativist.com

For those who wish to post, it is recommended that you first visit the site at:

http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/DoctorDave2.html

The discussion between Doctor Dave and myself underscores the relevant issues. The paragraphs are numbered for easy reference.

  • likes, 53 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (bgaede)

  • everyone check out Bill's 6th video "Did you ever take math" I very clearly bested him... and now he's trying to censor me

  • "Bill's... trying to censor me"

    .

    Please don't flog yourself any longer, Xero! The men with white jackets will be here soon to take you to a nice place.

see all

All Comments (2,866)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @bgaede You're the funniest person in physics. In ways that's not saying much but considering some of the theories that are put forth... particularly in Quantum...maybe it is saying a lot.

  • @bgaede lol this coming from the guy who made a whole video about censorship to QQ about your ideas not being taken seriously because of the entrenched establishment

  • Stop mumbling in the mirror and turn around, Succ.

  • @bgaede I'm clearly talking to an idiot, good bye.

  • "i'm explaining the concept to you, i'm not promoting it. Because it seems you don't understand the basic idea"

    .

    Oh, what part did I not understand? I thought I made it clear that space is a concept. So how do you expect me to visualize space in 2D or 3D if space is a CONCEPT? WHAT is there to visualize?

  • @bgaede i'm explaining the concept to you, i'm not promoting it. Because it seems you don't understand the basic idea by the look of this video. You're not even addessing the points i'm making, your just talking about other ideas you have. Which sugests you really don't understand the idea properly at all.

  • 2. "a 2D grid, you need to visualize it in 3D"

    Is space a hammock, you nincompoop? Is this the 'space' thingy the monks taught you...

    .

    en.wikipedia org/wiki/File:Spacetime_curvat­ure.png

    .

    How can there be such idiotic people like Succ in the 21st C that they actually believe and say that space is a grid? It boggles the mind.

  • 1. "the pulling effects mass exserts on space"

    Are you really THAT stupid, Succ? How can you pull on space if space is a CONCEPT! Can you pull on love? Can you pull on justice?

    .

    The fucking morons of Relativity have converted space into a physical object and now talk about pulling on 'it'!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more