WTC Atomic Core

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,977
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 13, 2009

One way of removing the core...

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Perfect hole! Something that would go right through the center of the building!

    The Defense Dept. has super-computers to simulate what would happen, given certain parameters. It would not be such a big deal to give someone a hypothetical to work on involving, for example, a WTC tower, and never knowing what happened to their study. If they open their mouth after recognizing their results, just have a fatal accident or commit suicide.

  • this video goes hand in hand with dimitri khalezov's nuclear demoltion. an example of how the towers were demolished

see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @tropophyte I was commenting mainly on the idea where people could work on something without knowing how their study will be used.My bases for making any comments about 911 is that I watched the video made by the military unit doing an anti-terrorism drill at Battery Park, South of the WTC towers, so I know the angle of approach the airliner made to the south tower and the other object picked up by chopper 4 was not it, so it leaves that open to being a cruise missile that hit the west face.

  • @jmdewey60 It doesn't explain how wtc 1 and wtc 2 would have exploded from the top in the top down fashion. It doesn't explain why the buildings tipped at the top when the buildings began to fall. It doesn't explain the weird scars people accuse of being from DEW tech in the side of the woolworth building.

  • Ground Zero means "the detonation point of a nuclear device"

    in pre-2001 dictionaries!

  • @oOBunnyackOo Was there ever any radiation test results published? Anyone know?

  • @oOBunnyackOo They used ADM Atomic demolition munitions with very very low yield of maximum 50 meters reach. They had these devices in the 1950's for troops to parachute into Russia, plant an ADM on a bridge and remotely detonate it. These devices are what caused the molten steel which traditional CD experts say shouldn't be there. Its the radioactive decay. Lots of dump trucks carrying dirt were brought in for the cleanup. I think 3000 cleanup workers are dying mysteriously from radiation.

  • @oOBunnyackOo Look anywhere. Wikipedia has a page on it, and there are dozens of articles on the mysterious "9/11 sickness". And not everyone agrees on what caused it.

  • @oOBunnyackOo "Why is there no radiation?"

    How do you explain that almost all 9/11 responders (who are still alive) are now suffering from leukemia and from various types of cancers typical to those evolving in result of chronic radiation sickness?

  • might it be, that two possibilities could had been taken for that "demolition"?!

    in the underground a nuke , which makes a hole, and above soem explosions of nanothermite? the knocked down towers would better fall down, because they would have enough room...and that radiation, you should look to some rats of NewYork, because they would get leucemia....

  • @oOBunnyackOo

    Dimitri Khalezov explains 911... No more theories... He is an eyewitness...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more