Avoidable vs Unavoidable subjection
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (mr1001nights)
Top Comments
-
It is interesting to note that I never even heard of this group ("Anarcho-capitolists") untill I started roaming around youtube. I have never seen two more contradictory words strung together, their like a Monty Python skit without the wit.
4 years ago 3
-
You continue to impress me, brother. This was an excellent response.
4 years ago 3
All Comments (48)
-
I like you better with the beard.
-
Haha. It is a rare moment on youtube where one party concede's that the other wins. ;o)
It's ok for me, though. My goal is not to be correct. My goal is to find truth.
Peace
-
Well thats good to know. At least we aren't arguing over some ridiculous human nature point.
-
Yep, you win, because I don't really derive any arguments from it. My latest video states that I am against collectivism from a point of practicality and pragmatism.
-
Which disproves your statement that "mass collectivism is unnatural", right? Which means that any arguments derived from that assumption have also been disproved.
-
Yes, that comment is old. A sort of "collectivism" worked for Native American Indians before the British settlers arrived.
I think collectivism used to work quite well.
-
My nation's history, as well as the history of most other indigenous nations I've encountered on this continent, seem to disagree with you.
-
Although you commented saying the baby analogy may not be a good one, it was simply put and made sense.
In nature, the lion eats the antilope.
Does that mean the rich man should eat the poor man? Not at all.
We are not animals, we have higher states of consciousness and just because something may happen in nature, does not mean we must follow.
Besides, "Anarcho"-Capitalism is Capitalism without government -- it's uncontrolled.
It would be worse than our current system..
- 6:56Do we live in a matriarchal society?by mr1001nights823 views
- 3:22Wage Slavery viewed by different schools of eco...by mr1001nights569 views
- 2:13Only anarcho-communism could create desirable jobsby mr1001nights1,226 views
- 6:25The Swedish feminist nightmareby mr1001nights1,114 views
- 2:58God the psycho?by LifeofApollos16,686 views
- 5:21Chomsky refutes "libertarian" "anarcho"- capita...by mr1001nights130,499 views
- 1:49GOD EXISTS, ATHEISTS!!! I'll prove it SCIENTIFI...by ooga2012983,147 views
- 6:09No mosque at Ground Zeroby patcondell5,960,032 views
- 4:45Pat Condell's hypocrisy vis a vis Islamby mr1001nights14,492 views
- 2:32BIG FRONT GRILL Intro Videoby BigFrontGrill126 views
- 1:33PM Manmohan Singh justifies crackdownby azadvichar65 views
- 7:40The gathering stormby patcondell153,705 views
- 1:14:56PEN Webinar: Including Assistive Technology in ...by parentednet35 views
- 4:4321st Century Cowboy Iraq Warby JohnMoshon29 views
-
2:11:39Jai Santoshi Maaby shemaroomovies5,046 views
- 44:10WV 2011 State of the State Addressby HerdVideo1,899 views
- 3:45The long-term material value of ideologyby mr1001nights413 views
- 4:44Britain is a riotby patcondell390,785 views
- 5:16The great Palestinian lieby patcondell300,160 views
- 6:50Aggressive atheismby patcondell703,639 views
Monarchy was natural and it worked for a time.
Slaves were natural and it worked for a time.
Capitalism is natural and it may be replaced at some time.
Mass collectivism is unnatural...
Sepero1 3 years ago
All ruling classes and their ideologues have identified their rule with natural forces. It's just vulgar apologetics, really.
mr1001nights 3 years ago
When it comes to economics, I don't think in terms of apologetics. I think in terms of effective vs ineffective.
Sepero1 3 years ago
and who doesnt say that?
mr1001nights 3 years ago
So you are a baby?
qtronman 3 years ago
that is just an example--maybe a bad one. Don't dwell on it. try to be honest and get at the substance of the argument. Do u perceive the difference between the unavoidable subjection of nature and the avoidable subjection of social structures?
mr1001nights 3 years ago