Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

HOW OBAMA CAN BURY HILLARY NOW

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,381
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 6, 2008

HOW OBAMA CAN BURY HILLARY RIGHT NOW. IMMEDIATELY. (DOES HE HAVE THE COURAGE?)


by Mia T, December 22, 2007


Barack Obama can knock hillary clinton out of the race right now, with one fatal blow.

Indeed, he is the only person with both the ability and the incentive to do it now. (The time for the Republicans to deal that fatal blow would be in the general, so the conventional wisdom goes.)

How does Obama do this? Simply by requesting and publishing the 120 redacted pages of the Barrett Report. They document massive clinton abuse of power and were redacted by more massive clinton abuse of power. (Do not miss the irony here.)

But does Obama have the courage to do it?



THE BARRETT REPORT.

By Mark Goodman.

January 31, 2007.

The bell has just rung on the 2008 presidential sweepstakes and already more entries have crowded into the gates than the American grandstand can count, much less account for. That's all to the good, as the only winners over the past two decades have been named either Bush or Clinton. Still, since nothing less than the fate of the nation seems to be at stake, it is imperative that all candidates be measured as closely as possible for merit and accountability, beginning with the most visible pretender, Senator Hillary Clinton.

The disturbing problem is, neither the Democrats nor Republicans on Capitol Hill are disposed to brace Mrs. Clinton, even though it is immediately within their power to do so.

Let's return one year to the yellowing Barrett report. In February 2006, after nine years of hard labor. Washington lawyer David Barrett, the Independent counsel appointed to investigate the Henry Cisneros scandal, finally published his 684-page report. His study provoked commentary mainly for what was missing,120 pages of evidence, reportedly devastating to both Clintons, which Democratic congressmen, led by Senators John Kerry, Dick Durbin and Byron Dorgan, had redacted by attaching a rider to another bill.

Deeply frustrated by nine seasons of blockading by Clinton lawyers and Democratic congressmen, Mr. Barrett Issued a statement saying, "An accurate title for the report would be, 'What We Were Prevented from Investigating.'" What, Indeed.

In an online column written before he signed on as President Bush's press secretary, Tony Snow reported that by all accounts the redacted pages contained enough damning evidence to sink Mrs. Clinton's presidential ship.

Mr. Snow's widely held view made sense, else why would the Democrats go to such extravagant lengths to shield the pages from the light of day? However, there was a catch to the redaction: Any congressman could secure a copy of the vaulted evidence merely for the asking.

As It happened, I had trod a path parallel to Mr. Barrett's in my own investigation into corruption in the highest precincts of a global media conglomerate which led In turn led to evidence of obstruction by President Clinton.

An abiding theme in the redacted pages, insiders say, is the Clinton camp practice of using the I.R.S. to punish its enemies. Mr. Clinton plainly did not leave this illegal practice behind in the Oval Office. By all accounts he has maintained a tight grip on a number of government departments and agencies, notably the Justice Department and the I.R.S., the folks who can deal the deadliest damage.

I can personally vouch for the Clinton I.R.S. strategy. In 2002, after I had learned of Mr. Clinton's intrusion into the case I had reported to the I.R.S., I informed Mrs. Clinton of the facts I'd uncovered. Soon enough the I.R.S. came calling with unwarranted tax demands and threats of criminal investigation. I replied accusing the I.R.S. of conspiring with the Clintons and the media conglomerate to perpetrate "institutionalized terrorism.' The agency, finally grasping the irony that it was seeking to punish its own whistleblower, quickly backed off....

I submit that in this crucial election season the American public, which, after all, paid $20 million In hard tax dollars for the Barrett report, has every right to access of all pertinent information available on presidential candidates.

Now that the senator from New York has announced "I'm in to win," voters should demand that their representatives release the mystery pages so that they may examine Mrs. Clinton red in tooth. Otherwise, Americans run the risk of going to the polls in 2008 seeking the rebirth of a nation only to discover that they have merely traded the devil for a witch.

Also see:
Stalinist Rising? hillary clinton abuse of power (Where is the unredacted Barrett Report, anyway?)

  • likes, 18 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (miat1111)

  • OHIO bulletin!! Repubs are being urged to go to the polls 3/4 and vote overwhelmingly for Obama. We have our candidate already, so why not make sure Obama wins OHIO, and shut Hitlery down. Send her a big OHIO message, and make it loud and clear. We love McCain, and he has our vote on 11/08, but on 3/08 we will vote for Obama to defeat Hitlery. GET RID OF ALL THINGS CLINTON FOREVER!! DO IT NOW!! SHE IS OWED NOTHING BY THIS NATION!!!

  • We must ABSOLUTELY do this. In Texas, too.

    We will not survive another clinton. (Indeed, we may yet not survive the first.)

    I will be posting a new video on this tomorrow.

  • Is this like every other report about the Clintons that turned out to be complete BS?

  • 1/2

    I don't agree with your premise. The catch-22 of nailing the clintons is the clinton jackboot, the very abuse of power that is the subject of this report.

    The non-random, massive targeting of clinton foes and victims with IRS audits and threats of criminal prosecution speaks for itself.

    Siccing the IRS and DOJ on one's foes is what they do in Putin's Russia, what they did in the old Soviet Union. Is this what you want for this country?

  • 2/2

    Either continue not to believe your lying eyes or read the article and David Barrett's statements/report:

    deletehillary(dot)com/the_barr­ett_report

    and

    barrett.oic(dot)gov

    Note that the author of the commentary is Mark Goodman, a DEMOCRAT and AVOWED LIBERAL who worked with the clintons and witnessed their abuse of power firsthand.

  • 1/2

    Barack Obama can knock hillary clinton out of the race right now, with one fatal blow.

    Indeed, he is the only person with both the ability and the incentive to do it now. (The time for the Republicans to deal that fatal blow would be in the general, so the conventional wisdom goes.)

  • 2/2

    How does Obama do this? Simply by requesting and publishing the 120 redacted pages of the Barrett Report. They document massive clinton abuse of power and were redacted by more massive clinton abuse of power. (Do not miss the irony here.)

    But does Obama have the courage to do it?

Top Comments

  • OBAMA 2008

  • The Clintons are criminals.

    Obama,Paul,Kucinich,Gravel,Edw­ards all better.Good luck and God bless America!!!

see all

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • cacmxliii, larch, and the rest of you Hillary spammers, you need to GET OVER IT. Your hysteria is pathetic. Hillary is a sinking ship -- her campaign is out of money, and she is behind in delegates. It just isn't going to happen for her. Obama will be the nominee, so I suggest you learn to get over your bigotry, and stop the fear-mongering. Obama is NOT the bogeyman. He is not a racist, or a Marxist, or a Muslim, and he is not out to get you or destroy our country! PLEASE, get a grip!

  • I'm not niave enough to think that a release of this report would sink Hillary Clinton. I could, but most people don't pay enough attention for it to matter. This country and our media make a bigger deal out of non-issues like the bitter comment, Geraldine Ferraro, clevage, if Obama is black enough, if Obama is too black, Hillary's laugh, etc. then out of actually policy issues and reports of corruption.

  • Who pays the 20 plus million dollars for the states to revote?

    If money wasn't an option I'd support it...of course I still think the ideal would be a national primary decided by popular vote, but that's another issue.

  • You got that one wrong ,dude! he doesnt need to because she is self destructive. Investing in her destruction is a waste of resources.

  • it and werent quite ready,would it then be fair to do a re-vote in LA? Or the Casino workers in Vegas who couldnt make it to the poll after the Casino polling post were contested by Hillary's legal team,now say they want their votes to count and thier voices heard,would the DNC also consider a re-vote in Vegas?

  • First and Fore most,Revoting in this case is NOT a Fair game.You can not change the rule after a game especially after all parties concerned had approved the rule before the game.Secondly,if the people of FL and Michighan knew what the implications of moving forward their election were going to be,but never the less went ahead doing it,then it save to conclude that they had accepted their faith as well.Dont do the Crime,if u cant do the time.What if LA came forward to say they were rush in to

  • FifiLanaPrincess Are there any Obama supporters that support a FAIR ELECTION? Who support a re-vote in FL and MI so the person with the Most Votes wins the nomination?

    -----------

    I live in Florida its because of the idiot Democrats here that we lost the primary elections. They messed up . which is why in next election we are voting AGAINST them for being so inept

  • FifiLanaPrincess, normally I would certainly encourage a re-vote but in the last few weeks I have seen Clinton acting like Karl Rove was her mentor using the "kitchen sink" approach of an unimaginative mean spirited mind. I now consider Florida and Michigan Clinton's comeuppance. And then this last news bit about Bosnia and Clinton under snipper fire she wasn't just "mixing up facts" she was "making up facts" which makes her appear delusional.

  • Use your own voice loser, if he could have, believe me they would have, barackabites have been physically fighting at caucuses and not able to win. You make no sense. Even using white liberal guilt, BO has only chewed on his foot, good luck.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more