Jackson Pollock 51

Jackson Pollock 51, 1951 (excerpt)
Hans Namuth and Paul Falkenberg (directors)
Morton Feldman (composer)

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• pollock
• abstract
• expressionism

[Anaemnesis]

He used random movements to document subconscious and Truth, much like Burroughs did with cut-ups and writing. Art did follow his trend. Documenting Truth will always be done in ways not understood by many: Go to Google and search The Truth Contest, then click on the first result, then on The Present. Do not be many, be you.  Seek and you will find.

[aC1dxN1gHtM4rEs]

splendor. There are others that agree, and, maybe we're just stupid because there are many people that don't. That's a fairly elegant portion of the human condition; we see things from differnt angles. It's beuatiful. Maybe you're an artist yourself.? Go and paint/draw/scupt what you have to and enjoy that art that is exceptional... to you. No one can make you think otherwise. Thank you and peace with you friend.

[OfficialOffice]

IMHO I just hate how this guy is the "influential American painter". His painting just splatter plain and simple. And these art critics just make stuff up so his work would make sense. Also this alcoholic scum drove drunk and killed a a innocent victim and himself.

[booriley781]

@hakkujin I'm not gonna sit here and exchange insults with you, since you clearly no nothing about artistic value. Bob Ross fro? Happy little trees? That the best you got? Dude, this shows how much you know about art. And for the record, antagonizing yourself on a Jackson Pollock video won't help you get a clue. Oh, and I hate to break it to you, BUT HE'S FUCKING DEAD! Nothing you say is gonna change history and wipe Pollock from the history books. Get a life and get the fuck over yourself.

[aC1dxN1gHtM4rEs]

@hakkujin I'm quite aware that my perseptions and veiws mean absolutely nothing in the conversation. No matter what I say, I will never be able to change your veiws. And I'm perfectly satisfied with that because - in that same vien - I'm fairly set in my own artisitc world veiw. I do consider mentioning that, after Pollack's overnight rise to fame, the man often worried about his work's integrity. Sometimes he wasn't able to justify it. However, the images mean something to me in all my unelite

[hakkujin]

@aC1dxN1gHtM4rEs No, Pollock didn't give a damn. He was the first emo. "My life is hard and nobody understands me." He just threw paint onto a canvas. No artistic ability whatsoever. It's funny that pompous people whom think that they are the artistic elite claim to appreciate Pollock's splatters. If you have to explain it, it's not art. Van Gogh's paintings spoke for themselves. Pollock's paintings look like diarrhea splattered all over the inside of a toilet bowl.

[hakkujin]

@booriley781 "Graduated from an art college" is a soft way of saying that you're a jobless dickhead. Pollock's paintings suck. They're bullshit splatters. It's not art. He has never shown that he can even draw a stick figure. His "art" is as pointless and ridiculous as your silly rage. It's funny to hear a guy whom graduated from an art college act tough though. You're a real badass with your Bob Ross fro and your happy little trees, aren't you?

[BESTRKSOE]

@hakkujin Kill yourself.