This video is unavailable.
Jackson Pollock 51
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like facs1900b's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike facs1900b's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add facs1900b's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Dec 1, 2006
Jackson Pollock 51, 1951 (excerpt)
Hans Namuth and Paul Falkenberg (directors)
Morton Feldman (composer)
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
- Buy "Music For The Film 'Jackson Pollock': III: Pollock Paints" on
Google PlayiTunesAmazonMP3 -
Artist
Philipp Vandre
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
56:21
Jackson Pollock documentaryby E.W.R. ManyFeatured
20,181
-
1:13:24
Who the #$_% Is Jackson Pollock (Subtitulada Español)by JESUS HF
17,648 views
-
9:21
Salvador Dali on "What's My Line?"by Kembrew McLeod
2,469,420 views
-
6:11
5 Year Old Prodigy Aelita Andre: A Secret Universe/ a solo exhibition 2012by AgoraGallery
480,294 views
-
4:46
VOKA - Marilyn Monroe - Spontaneous Realismby art VOKA
441,317 views
-
3:45
Pollockby pedrocorradini
92,652 views
-
63
videos
Play all
Arte documenti Ph. Daverioby eidroeg72
-
Jackson Pollock
2,141 videos50
-
5:05
Drip paintingby agnescecile
148,676 views
-
10:04
Rudy Ernst presents... Dada Action Painting at the QCC Art Galleryby CUNYQueensborough
137,295 views
-
4:43
Jackson Pollock Biographyby Fivefists
26,172 views
-
2:31
Jackson Pollock & Mark Rothko: Icons of Abstract Expressioniby artfilms07
131,515 views
-
8:21
Abstract Art Action Painting Dripping IDYLLIC DISASTER by Lepolsk Matuszewski - Fine artby Lepolsk MATUSZEWSKI
216,958 views
-
21:47
Pollock. El artista y el mito. El action-painting.by cineCAV
31,831 views
-
1:39
What Mark Rothko thinks about modern art & peopleby tvpaker2008
48,280 views
-
9:57
Marcel Duchamp speaks about his workby ArtPatrolTV
58,953 views
-
6:49
Pollock In Actionby extrapixel83
362,308 views
-
59:01
The Power of Art - Rothkoby ArtHistoryLuv
17,971 views
-
6:16
Julian Schnabel, Lee Krasner, Malcolm Morley (excerpts, ART/new york no. 18)by innertubevideo
15,241 views
-
4:02
AB EX NY: The Painting Techniques of Jackson Pollock: One: Number 31, 1950by MoMAvideos
36,462 views
-
3:32
The real Frida Kahlo Videoby oJessy
510,607 views
-
3:42
The Subterraneans - Kerouac, Pollock and Bowieby mooch cassidy
19,651 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
Pinkster1974 2 months ago
I respect your opinion that you don't think his art is good. It's all in the eye of the beholder. I've seen works by other artists who've been "labelled" as "great", yet I didn't connect with or enjoy their work. I never said he was a great artist, only that in my opinion, I think he is. There are enough people who agree with me that made him rise to the level of someone who's considered a great artist. By all means, disagree. But claiming his art isn't good, doesn't make it not good.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Pinkster1974 2 months ago
It seems as if you don't think his drip and splatter technique rises to the level of "painting". I didn't have to use my imagination. Art isn't meant to be appreciated and critiqued from pictures in books. Until one sees an artist's work in person, I don't believe a valid judgement of the work can be made.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Video Responses
All Comments (744)
Matthew Ballaro 3 weeks ago
Like if you got here from jacksfilms
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Flower Murphy 3 weeks ago
THAT MUSIC AT THE END IS SO DISJOINTED IT'S HILARIOUS I CAN'T STOP LAUGHING
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Frank Hogarth 3 weeks ago
very interesting points being made here and i can see how complex the nature of art and painting can be.i have just recently found the world of art and am in awe of your knowledge my friends.as far as pollock is concerned i am divided.on the one hand i cannot place him alongside the aforementioned masters but i found myself likeing the idea of a pollock on my wall....take care
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
GoldenOx 2 months ago
"Titian, Rubens, Degas, Redon, Van Gogh, Pollock, Warhol etc... very inaccurate." This is what i meant, it is inaccurate to use the same word to describe all of them, since some of them did something that should not be put into the same category but this is exactly what ppl do.
Regarding Vincent. What what is truly sad is that ppl know more about him as figure in popular culture who had a tragic life but not a lot about his works.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Runconna 2 months ago
I do think to word painting applies very much to the works of Titian, Rubens and Degas but not at all Pollock or Warhol, they 'could' belong in the Art category where rich collectors then can play with their ranks. I guess that's one of the major problems of today's mainstream art world, that people put Titian, Rubens, Degas and then Pollock and Warhol in the same sentence as if they did the same thing... My feelings about Van Goghs are a little mixed, sad story witch hold great commercial value
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
GoldenOx 2 months ago
Sorry i have misinterpreted your post. I see what you mean and i agree with you, as time passes and new things are being done we still tend to use the same concepts/words we always had to label them and that is confusing to say the least. Using the word painting and talking about the works of Titian, Rubens, Degas, Redon, Van Gogh, Pollock, Warhol etc... very inaccurate.
One the side note: Can Degas, Monet and Van Gogh be considered as technical painters ( just curious:) Thanks!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Runconna 2 months ago
Pollock was great at what he did, dripping. There is nothing wrong with liking his work at all, my 'opinions' about him isn't as an artist (art is what you make it) but as a painter, he IS being celebrated as one of the greatest painters in today's Art world and that's where my issue lies, never meant great art were the result of great skills, i understand painting not so much the art thing.... Maybe you can lecture me.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
GoldenOx 2 months ago
Please dont take my comment as meant to be harsh , but i do think your understanding of art is a little bit limited ( which donest mean it is a bad thing or it could'nt change in the future). It would be truly a sad thing if proper art could only be produced in ways you described (by great technical skills) be it music, paintings, sculpture, literature.
Newer stuff gets more attention ( and that is not a bad thing) but that doesnt mean everything old will be forgotten:)
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
GoldenOx 2 months ago
Jackson Pollock is a great artist, whether you agree or not. Never knew anything about how he or art was being marketed at the time, just loved most of his paintings ( dripping and pre dripping period) from the very start. Never seen one in person but that only means i have missed a lot of his brilliance.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube