Jackson Pollock 51

@excelephant was the elephant that trampled the crowd because he knew that his being was being compromised, was joseph merrick addorned for his fabulously good looks, according to mrs shrek? Who is the great and knowing exeplant? humans will never know, but the creten will follow thee into the unerbelly of your twitterness.

Hey, Kentheseer and theenlightenedgenius, It's ironic that you are both trying to defend Pollock, an important pioneer of originality of expression, and neither of you could even formulate an original comment. Note for later, when plagiarising from a textbook, change some of the words to make it look as though you at least tried to think for yourself.

@synestheticmusic, I would suggest that, if you are finding it difficult to get the colours and balance right, you may be trying to copy the visual aspect of Pollock too closely. Paint impulsively what you feel in the particular moment, that's what he did, otherwise it's a hollow impression. Good luck.

It does sound as though he has the

ability to express himself verbally.

Jackson Pollock 51 1:05 hmm.....

i dont know about this...im still not that far into art. it seems like crap to me..but i probably need to evolve a bit..

Very interesting the way he describes his paintings, techniques etc.

If I sit at a grand piano, then stand on the keyboard and stomp around on it with all of my emotions and creativity flowing forth with passion, and the sound the piano makes is vibrant and grand, (you have to be there in person order to appreciate the sound of that piano) am I then a composer, just like Mozart?

@FalloutHeaven No, just as Pollock is not a painter just like Michelangelo - he was unique in his own style and purpose. I don't suggest that everyone should think a Pollock is brilliant, I believe it requires a certain mindset to appreciate such a style, but why can't people just accept that they don't have that mindset without rubbishing everyone who does?