DEBS DOES ADDENDUM

An investigation into Simon Shacks claim that a certain helicopter was absent from network footage during the collapse of WTC2; a claim made in his September Clues Addendum Chapter 1.
And now that we have more information about a helicopter in the footage during the collapse of Tower Two, we can make a better judgment about Simons claim.

Did Simon cut out inconvenient and potentially contradictory facts? It would seem so!
What about poor research skills or willful negligence? I see no effort that Simon tried to find a longer clip of the zoomin showing a helicopter during the collapse.
And finally, did someone tamper with the evidence to bleach out not one, but 2 helicopters? Did Simon have the means, motive, and opportunity?
Simons methods seem to be very impressive, but for the wrong reasons!
So, Simon, himself, presented Pat the helicopter in live footage during the collapse; completely debunking his own claim; demonstrating once again that Simon publishes in the auto-debunkery genre.

Septemberclues.info simon shack 911 9/11 wtc collapse nyc terrorism disinformation psyops evidence parallax socialservice

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Septemberclues.info
• simon
• shack
• 911
• 9/11
• wtc
• collapse
• nyc
• terrorism
• disinformation
• psyops
• evidence
• parallax
• socialservice

[claudiocastellini]

Explain this: Pat is clearly in FRONT of tower 1 (3:17, 3:56) at the time of COLLAPSE. At 4:01 and 4:21 it should be right where Shack POINTS. And yet you say we can't see Pat because of the smoke ?? That position is almost BEHIND tower 2. You 've placed Pat at two different places at the time of collapse !!

[YougeneDebs]

@claudiocastellini Thank you for watching. I am not sure what you are saying when you say that I have placed Pat at two different places. I don't start my rebuttal until the 6th minute. Could you please watch again? If I have made a mistake, I would like to know. Thanks.

[claudiocastellini]

I was perfectly clear. At the time of collapse Pat should be in front of tower 1 as we see in the 3:17 map. You 've shown that at the time of collapse at 6:06 Pat was BEHIND the smoke. Only problem is that this is NOT in front of tower 1 but way back. You 've proved Shack correct.

[YougeneDebs]

@claudiocastellini Please watch the sequence from 5:34 and forward thru 6:06. We see that Pat is right where it should be prior to collapse, but as the camera zooms out, Pat becomes *smaller* and seems to disappear. Simon snipped out the early part to mislead people.

[claudiocastellini]

Unbelievable how you twist your own video. Pat doesn't "become smaller" but it's hidden by the SMOKE as it flies to the LEFT. (The camera zooms out AFTER that). This is only possible if Pat is way back and not in front of tower 1 as we see in other shots. It seems the one who debunked his own claim is you. Better luck next time.

[YougeneDebs]

@claudiocastellini If you want to believe that Pat gets hidden by the smoke, then please post a video showing what you believe to be true. Thank you for your interest in my work.

[The911REGIMENT]

mmm I thought that was your agenda YougeneDebs..  ;-)

[The911REGIMENT]

discrediting the Truth movement in general and TV Fakery in particular...

[elsushidelamancha]

that analysis is so weak and biased. good luck to debunk September Clues, I bet you carefully which parts you though would be apparently easier to debunk...but even with those so-called well carefully chosen parts of yours, you simply fail to bring any counter evidence to the now very well documented and established fact that 9/11 was major TV fakery. period.

[checkThrice]

Shack did an amazing job with the planes.

but lost his marbles and is trying to prove now his mom and dad are fake additions too.

[ChristianHolloway7]

I posted this on the video. The res is to crap to capture pat, He removed comment and blocked me. Thanks Eugene for this and FK you Shack you clown.

[losability]

shill

[xxxNiceLifexxx]

maybe some braindead americans will buy that crap