Chicken & Egg: DNA cannot exist - without DNA! (Dr. Sarfati)

Several features of the genetic code could not have developed without, well, the genetic code! Information Density & Coding, Enzymes, Catalysts. (Dr. Jonathan Sarfati)

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Jonathan
• Sarfati
• The
• Complexity
• of
• Life
• Cell
• Biology
• Microbiology
• Creation
• Evolution
• Old
• Young
• Earth
• Design
• chemical
• bonding
• life
• proteins
• molecular
• God
• Bible
• religion
• creator
• molecules
• complicated
• irreducible
• complexity
• intelligent
• design
• atheism
• agnosticism
• random
• chance
• worldview
• origins
• high-tech
• technology
• nanotechnology
• chemistry
• development
• science
• DNA
• information
• density
• storage
• Ribosome
• decoding
• translation
• Globulous
• Enzymes
• Catalyst
• RNA
• chicken
• egg
• natural
• selection

[alyosha24601]

Neanderthal DNA is no more different than modern human DNA than one race is from another. "Neanderthal man" is just another variety of human. Of course it's mixed with modern human DNA; it is human DNA! No evolution however. Neanderthal fitness was higher than our own with a longer lifespan and a bigger brain. It's not only humans, either. Most species were bigger and lived longer in the past. What we observe is that DNA is mutating, degrading, and unwinding today. Evolution is quack science.

[StuartWillet]

So, no evolution. Why then, are people born today with no appendix?

Why is the number slowly increasing worldwide?

[alyosha24601]

@StuartWillet I've never heard of that but it's a typical evolutionist bait 'n switch. Why? Because LOSING an appendix is a LOSS of information - not a gain of it. Where someone born with an infrared eye, now THEN I'd believe in evolution. By the way, evolutionists used to tell us there were "vestigial" organs of evolution. Now there are none. The appendix is essential to the immune system of babies! They die without it. Evolution really is quack science; it's naturalistic religion (scientism).

[SuperJewbot]

3 hours and a billion sandshrews later... and then magikarp refuses to evolve, ugh. i stopped bulbasaur from evolving so it'll have the body of an infant forever, cause dats how i like my bulbasaurs - young and easily persuaded, bruh. now if you can show me a real live dugtrio then i might believe. the only changeless in change. the whole universe is curled up inside every particle. it behaves in only the most clever ways. you can see it if you want. destroy identification. evolution is obvious.

[alyosha24601]

@SuperJewbot It's obvious if you possess a religious naturalist presupposition. If you do not then the science will lead you to creation. DNA is degenerating rapidly today (just like everything else in the whole universe!!)  - how could "evolution" have ever occurred in the past? Those who believe in evolution actually have a religious confidence as the foundation of their thinking. Evolution is quack science - most of the world knows it.

[StuartWillet]

@alyosha24601 So, what was neanderthal man and how is it's DNA still mixed with Human if there is no evolution?

Bare in mind, it's only mixed with human DNA from the humans who left Africa.

All humans who stayed in Africa do not have neanderthal DNA.

yes, ALL humans started off in Africa.

[blardosplats]

@SuperJewbot That's my ex-wife you are talking about so watch it!

#10, I don't know. I used to call her old #7.

[blardosplats]

@alyosha24601

But that's just it. Evolution happened at least once. And how does entropy prove creation? Does old age and death preclude birth and life and growth (that's why I ask if a flower can grow in a junkyard)?

Can God's image and what He called "good" just a few days later be cursed with a slow death? Entropy is built in, or it isn't.

[blardosplats]

@alyosha24601 Just to thicken the soup (and I'm having trouble keeping up with this!), let's assume that after all the shredding, burning, rotting, and tearing were done, we have monkeys typing Shakespeare. Would it look so different from all of these comments?