Saab 9-5 Aero 230 hp 100-200km/h acc.

Saab 9-5 Aero 100-200 (station wagon), at the end (after changing into 5th gear) no full acceleration because of traffic ahead.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Saab
• 9-5
• 95
• aero
• 100-200
• acceleration
• beschleunigung

[AdamH108TA]

The 3.0 tid 95 sounds 10x better under load and it has more torque too, available at only 1500 rpm onwards. And it can get 40mpg lol.

[nasszelle01]

@AdamH108TA

You just forgot one big disadvantage: it's a diesel. And diesel sucks.

[drehtaffelist]

does anybody know, how many sec. this car takes from 0-100 kmh?

thanks for answer!

[nasszelle01]

about 7 secs...

[tophermonkey]

lol my dads se 2.3 t DOESN'T have a boost needle but i can say it is running 1.2 bar boost and was running 170hp standard tune but abbott racing fiddled with it lol. so it has a healthy 240 hp and more tourque than an aero as it has a hybrid turbo. even though 10hp less than aero it owns them as the larger impeller in the smaller gt17 turbo spools quicker than an aero and running1.2 bar boost boosts more to. hehe.

[nasszelle01]

This car is even not the 250hp version, it's the old 230hp...

but that doesn't matter very much, turbo rulez :D

[tomsoto1121]

saabs are so underrated for their performance, anyone who drives an aero would understand.

[Nsrmex]

Top Speed? Nice saab :)

[Nordb0nk]

the speedometer really look shit

[eloflinus]

i love Saab i got 9-3 aero coupe 2002. its not tuned but it takes only 5.9 - 6.2 sec too com 0-100. it take´s 18 sec from 100-200km/h are your car combi.

[lovesara850]

Ive taken my 2000 Aero to 250, they get up there quick!

[leambambam]

@nasszelle01

my 01' aero was dynoed half a year ago and has magically gained almost 25 horses, considering it now has nearly 300'000km on the odo. Great car!

[YS3Caero]

I do understand. But it´s better to be underrated!

[mavrick790]

I drive an Arc and the reason they're so great is for the high torque at low RPM.