Hugo Chavez BBC interview part 1/3

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• chavez
• venezuela
• usa
• us
• socialism
• communism
• capitalism
• columbia
• brazil
• iran
• ahmadinejad
• latin
• america
• israel
• gaza
• palestine
• flotilla
• bbc
• Stephen
• Sackur
• hardtalk

[maisantaerikakirea]

ITS REALLY FUNNY TO SEE HOW ALL THOSE BRITISH OR AMERICAN INTERVIEWERS FOR SOME REASON I IGNORE THEY TAKE THE ROLE OF JUDGES...AS IF THEIR VCOUNTRIES FULL OF POVERTY (US) DRUGADICTION, HORRIBLE EDUCATIVE SYSTEMS, ETC ETC THEY THINK THEY HAVE RIGHT TO JUDGE OTHER COUNTRIES...ARE THEY IGNORANT OR HYPOCRITICAL??? HAVE THEY STUDY THEIR FUCKING HISTORY FULL OF CRIMES, WARS, COLONIALISM, INVASIONS, ETC ETC ETC

[MagnitudePerson]

Dumbass interviewer. Go Hugo!

[HealthXpoint]

One thing I noticed about americans is that they have alot of confidence but scarely little knowledge about anything. Even the things they think they KNOW are so weird and deformed pictures its super scary.

This is what happens when you rather buy a gun than a book.

(Now the americans thinkin fuck books I got internet *facepalm*)

[PerlitaHabanera]

@Mokhtarnamah The point is not the reported himself, is that Venezuela is worse than is has eve been because of Chavez governement. The reported is just putting him on a spot, that's all.

[Mokhtarnamah]

@PerlitaHabanera The whole point is that this reporter is presenting himself as an unbiased interviewer.

If he is straight about it, and wants to have a discussion with president Chavez, he should say so in order for the president to be able to respond accordingly.

[PerlitaHabanera]

another thing when a person ask you a question and instead of giving a straight up answer you give a run around you are trying to convince ... because he doesn't have the right answer... he does not respect the rule of law... the facts are there and the answer is there, why couldn't just be simple and say "Yes! my government respect the rule of law" and then explain... because he doesn't even believe it himself, he is lying.

[PerlitaHabanera]

Chavez is the one who constantly says that socialism is a better government.. so if the interviewer wants to put him in a spot with his questions and refute him, that doesn't mean that he is judging, besides.... everybody has their own judgement, if Chavez says the socialism is better than capitalism and it shows is not true, my OWN judgement tell me he is a liar.

[Seaworldexists]

@xMaXiMuSx So we agree there was no institutional guarantee and a minimal functional guarantee of a bailout we can get back to business. The US is terrible at micro (bureacratic) regulation and following the depression had relied on macro (congressional) regulation of the banking sector. I maintain it moved away from macro regulation in the late 1990s allowing the banking sector to abandon its role as the bloodline of capital and became more like drunken casino patrons.

[xMaXiMuSx]

@Seaworldexists

yeah letting lehman go bust was the ONLY good thing we did in 2008.. I guess they got together and said lehman is the weakest link and let them go bust.

[Seaworldexists]

@xMaXiMuSx Yes Lehman was ecstatic about receiving a bailout on the verge of collapse. Are you kidding me? You also said there was an institutional guarantee of a bailout not a functional guarantee so youre backtracking.

[xMaXiMuSx]

@Seaworldexists

of course they knew they were going to get a bailout.. are you kidding me?? They own the goverment.. I stopped reading after the first sentence..

[Seaworldexists]

@xMaXiMuSx There was no legal guarantee of a bail out in law. It was prerogative power used by the executive branch and the federal reserve. A bank hitherto profited by collecting interest be it from loans or mortgages. Money from the fed allows them to give more loans sure. But for the banks the fundamental consideration before gramm-leech was will this loan be paid back. With their new powers the banks were able to make money packaging various high and low risk mortgages and lost their way.