they get special privileges on land and tax write offs. they use chinese labor. the only reason they're able to "underbid" local independent business' is because they had their goods made for 15 CENTS while the independent American shop owner had his goods made by Americans for a Dollar fifty!
and then wal mart only has to charge a Dollar 25 even though they're making their goods at 15 cents an item and they have a MONOPOLY! aren't anarchists supposed to be AGAINST monopolies!!!?
How so? They are not forcing you to buy their goods. Maybe you've been awake too long and you should probably take a long rest or switch to de-caff buddy.
wal-mart isn't exploiting anyone. It is safe to say that those workers probably are better off with the wal-mart being in their country than the wal-mart not being in china. Thats how the United states started off in the late 19th century early 20th century , and we turned out fine. Wal-mart was already growing as a business way before the Clintons moved to Washington.
If wal-mart were not present in many small towns, local monopolies would jack up the prices of the goods you bought. If wal-mart were soo evil, people shouldn't shopped there. There are far more superior businesses that not only provide a wider variety of goods, but they also provides those goods at cheaper prices(amazon, ebay, etc.)
If an entity becomes a monopoly, it is by transferring goods/services with properties that are valued by individuals voluntarily choosing to acquire said goods/services in exchange for something of "value" each individual holds.
"Because they need shit" Most of what Wal-Mart sells you do not need. People are voluntarily digging their grave
Even if one entity owns virtually all industries in a hypothetical society, the rest of "society" can gain power by collectively bargaining/boycotting.
yes they ARE!
they get special privileges on land and tax write offs. they use chinese labor. the only reason they're able to "underbid" local independent business' is because they had their goods made for 15 CENTS while the independent American shop owner had his goods made by Americans for a Dollar fifty!
and then wal mart only has to charge a Dollar 25 even though they're making their goods at 15 cents an item and they have a MONOPOLY! aren't anarchists supposed to be AGAINST monopolies!!!?
oldhacks 2 years ago
How so? They are not forcing you to buy their goods. Maybe you've been awake too long and you should probably take a long rest or switch to de-caff buddy.
Pentazoid111 2 years ago
you idiot. wal mart is fucking COMMUNISM/STATISM
wake the fuck up!
oldhacks 2 years ago
wal-mart isn't exploiting anyone. It is safe to say that those workers probably are better off with the wal-mart being in their country than the wal-mart not being in china. Thats how the United states started off in the late 19th century early 20th century , and we turned out fine. Wal-mart was already growing as a business way before the Clintons moved to Washington.
Pentazoid111 2 years ago
If wal-mart were not present in many small towns, local monopolies would jack up the prices of the goods you bought. If wal-mart were soo evil, people shouldn't shopped there. There are far more superior businesses that not only provide a wider variety of goods, but they also provides those goods at cheaper prices(amazon, ebay, etc.)
Pentazoid111 2 years ago
go get em hacks!
thedefendingchamp 2 years ago
If an entity becomes a monopoly, it is by transferring goods/services with properties that are valued by individuals voluntarily choosing to acquire said goods/services in exchange for something of "value" each individual holds.
"Because they need shit" Most of what Wal-Mart sells you do not need. People are voluntarily digging their grave
Even if one entity owns virtually all industries in a hypothetical society, the rest of "society" can gain power by collectively bargaining/boycotting.
gn0m1k 2 years ago
I don't care what you call it.
People need to be able to make the decisions for a change.
PersonalJesus348 2 years ago 2
What I hate the most is these Ancaps/Vulgarlibs dont' even care by which the land becomes the land becomes "legitimate".
Kill of the indigenous you say?
Thats cool, just don't disturb Walmart's property rights.
Enslave africans you say?
Its ok, it happened a couple hundred years ago, my property is "legitimate" of course.
Is property "legit" just when you happen to come upon it?
No matter the historical cost?
Statism is not the answer, but neither is capitalism unchecked.
Peacehand 2 years ago
Are they defending walmart? Oh for fucks sake I hope not. I've seen it on the tubes before but I expect better from noextort.
abortabraham 2 years ago 2