Star Trek meets Liberal Theology
Top Comments
All Comments (44)
-
You might as well change Scripture. Well we're trying. We've been trying for a long time.
That part made laugh
-
@SorokChyetirye One last thing. Google this:
The Justice of the term 'neo-Catholic' by Christopher A. Ferrara, Esq.
Also google this:
EWTN: A Network Gone Wrong
Also google this:
A Statement of Reservations Concerning the Impending Beatification of Pope John Paul II
And, finally, this:
Doubts About a Beatification by Fr. de la Rocque
-
@SorokChyetirye Mockery won't change the truth, though I understand it's all you can offer. Very common, especially in light of the ignorance V2 has spawned.
Speaking of 50 years, behold this encouraging statement:
"The new Mass is a passing phase. In 50 years, that will be entirely clear."
For the context in which this was said by a Vatican official, google this:
Vatican official: "The new Mass is a passing phase. In 50 years, that will be entirely clear" By Brian Kopp
-
@Jitpring Whatever. I'll see you in about 50 years, when we'll be laughing our heads off at how tight those tin pyjamas were you used to wear, when you were convinced that the one Church that denies the morality of contraception was a heresy and a pawn for the NWO, the Freemasons, and the Illuminati.
I'll be brewing a pot of tea for you when you show up. ;-)
Slava Tobi Bozhe,
GenghisKhan44
PS: This interview's over.
-
@SorokChyetirye By the way, the Fish Eaters forum isn't nearly as traditional as many think. Many there have conformed themselves to the world. Google search, for example, for a thread there entitled Conformity via Tattoos. Cathinfo is a more traditional forum.
-
@SorokChyetirye You're apparently unaware that Vatican II is itself the ne plus ultra of modernism. Get studying.
Regarding Fish Eaters, I post often on the forum there.
-
@Jitpring Our Lady's Warriors and the Fish Eaters are Traditionalists who, instead of creating schism and more conflict - as Protestants and Orthodox have already done, and your kind are doing - are trying to clean the modernism of the Church from the inside out. They have concerns like yours. But instead of leaving to start a new, unapostolic church, they are working to combat the liberals and modernists plaguing our Church, as THEY are the real problem, like Protestants are in a way.
-
@Jitpring You seem to be scared the world's going to collapse on you due to the liberalism and modernism in the world, and in the Church. But the Church is not, never was, and never will be liberal. Christ is still king; but it does no good to coerce His subjects to recognise Him. We and He must win them over in love, and not war.
But soft. I know some people who understand your concerns. Have you ever been to the Fish Eaters forums, or to ourladyswarriors? They may be able to help.
-
@SorokChyetirye Catholics before V2 wouldn't have recognized Dignitatis Humanae as Catholic teaching. This is because DH denies the doctrine of the Social Reign of Christ the King. Study Pope Pius IX's encyclical Quas Primas. Also study The Catechism of the Crisis in the Church by Fr. Matthias Gaudron. Like most since the disaster of V2, you've got a lot of learning to recover. Don't delay. Get started.
Also google for this page:
Understand the Conciliar Nightmare amazon
-
@Jitpring So, what beef do you have with DH? It tells us that public, communal religion is a human right; that the CC is the one true faith; that men and their families should not have their consciences or their religions restrained (as communism did and secularism in America is trying to do). The Church is defending our right to worship publicly and to follow our consciences in doing so. Forced religion is not religion at all, and forced secularism is the modern oppression.
Stanford Nutting... just got that... I'm slow...
schwammy14 2 years ago 4
hahaha. our lady of the pants suit
tatripp 1 year ago 3