William Lane Craig vs. Paul Draper-- Existence of God Part 3
Uploader Comments (TimeEffect)
All Comments (8)
-
I wonder if the disciples in mourning simply thought they saw jesus before them, scientific american did a study on this and many people have seen dead loved ones especially if they are under stress, drugs, and other influences. So it's possible that's what they saw.
-
:( now i want to know what that image was..
-
Man! Listening to Craig argue the probability of Jesus being the son of God is so funny. Couldn't get any weaker.
-
I think I was responding to an assertion along the lines that the buy-bull is the word of yhwh because it's internal consistent: something that even if it were true wouldn't mean anything.
It was more an ejaculation than anything premeditated.
-
I think he's talking about using the bible for evidence, saying that you cannot use it as good source since it's internally inconsistent.
But I'll let him speak for himself
-
kuroshashu-what are you responding to here?
-
It's a book boofhead. The very least it can be is internally consistent. It fails mostly, but the bits in which it doesn't aren't evidence.
Draper makes this argument that since theism makes dualism more likely, the fact that dualism is false is evidence against Theism. But what reasons exactly do we have to believe that dualism is false? I mean, he acts as if this were absolutely obvious, but its not to me. I very rarely hear anyone offer any arguments against it. But I've heard some good arguments for it?
philopathy 3 years ago
I accidentally removed your other comment on some transcript. I was trying to reply to it, but clicked remove by accident, sorry.
TimeEffect 3 years ago
Good debate between Craig and Robert Price too. You can find the mp3 on the net. Craig is very convincing if your already a Christian.
owheydusoapsk 3 years ago
I'll try uploading that if it's not on Youtube
TimeEffect 3 years ago