Higgs Field - Is the Universe Itself the Missing God Particle ? - Field Theory Physics

Higgs Field - Question: Is the Singularity that gave birth to our universe the missing God particle disintegrating ? ? ? - Field Theory Physics

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Higgs
• Field
• the
• Universe
• Missing
• God
• Particle?
• Theory
• Physics

[rphcomposer]

HIGGS BOSON have been called consciousness units or C'Us .Its in a book called seth speaks

[AcceleratorPlus]

@rphcomposer In my opinion… what we call particles.. are better understood as activities in a Primary Field (not yet acknowledged by existing physics. The activity of the “God Particle” is to gather the field together.. like gathering a cob-web to make a lump of matter. Like-wise.. the activity in the brain gathers together all our various perceptions into a lump we call.. ME. What physics mistakenly claims.. does not have any existence.. the vacuum.. is energy in a neutral state. .

[AcceleratorPlus]

to continue my comment.... part 2

The big bang arose from a particle sized singularity.. that started reproducing itself.. drawing its energy from the Primary Field. It was a process of transformation from dormant energy to active (excited) energy. Unconscious means consciousness is dormant.. but still exists as a potential. this is a good analogy for the Primary Field. Waves are information that we read as being a particle. But aren't they really a programming language.. ?

[MrBigolteddybear46]

The fundamental law of the universe is by definition, a contradiction to its own existence; therefore, in order to understand it if you will, we would need to enter into the realm of existence or dimension in which all matter is at its primary state of continuous energy, nothingness as most scientist refer to it.

[AcceleratorPlus]

@MrBigolteddybear46 I agree.. there is no such thing as nothingness.. there is only tangible and intangible.. or active and dormant energy. Everything is energy.. which in its primary state is intangible.. When we speak of NOTHINGNESS it means we can't detect anything.. just like.. there was a time when we couldn't detect the earth was round. Check out Something and Nothing on my recent favorites. There is still a Primary Field concept missing in existing physics.

[joppadoni]

the theory will only discover itself due to looking for the right mechanics to observe itself. as with all these 'problems'. if the standard model doesnt fit then it doesnt on such a fundamental task of looking for mass only. the idea of wave formulation and equatory theory is wrong. or as i expect the smallest wave functions can not be read and therefore we will never be able to know anyways. cure poverty and move forward

[raydredX]

@IntergrateThisFool But seriously. I'm very ignorant when it comes to General Relativity. But Newton will observe light acting in weird ways and following weird paths which he won't be able to explain with classical mechanics. What it looks to Newton is that the light's path is being bent.

[raydredX]

@IntergrateThisFool Black holes.

-"Photon goes in, photon no goes out. You can't explain that."

Bill

[IntergrateThisFool]

@raydredX From the perception of the photon the passage of time from x0 to x is instantaneous. X0 being its original positions and x its final position. Plus they have no measurable mass which would indicate that they are not affected by gravity.

[RunningOnChronic]

Does anyone know the name of the older physics with the white hair?

[Toroballs76]

How did I end up here. And I don't mean scientifically...

[RemainsRotting]

@rphcomposer maybe the site i have is not the most informative, do you know of a loaded resource page on SLC? reading in the sites i have, relates allot to KS i am looking for math geometry etc. at first glance to me keylontic science seemed completely retarded, only this year have my studies lead me to it, have been working on vortex based math (VBM) to understand the KS stuff, i still feel slightly unsure so i keep searching for different sources of info to help find belief. thanks :)

[gregrutz]

@AcceleratorPlus '''The big bang arose from a particle sized singularity.. '' No, a singularity does not have size. And all math breaks down.

[Typho0n86]

@ 5:28 higgs isnt simple or beautiful its simply wrong

[Typho0n86]

well if there are 16 fundemental particles, then thats 4^2 or 2^4, which could be diffrent particles LOL there could be only 2 particles, well i know there are only 2 particles, + and - lol dont care what u say, Higgs dont exist blah /spam