Debunking Creationists (Including Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron)

This video shows footage of shockingly stupid comments and points made by creationists. While putting things into perspective so we can see who deserves to be taken seriously and who does not.

I didn't make this video; I downloaded it a while ago from youtube and seems as if it was removed probably due to copyright issues.

Morons include: Zakir Naik, Ray Comfort, Kirk Cameron, blondie who tried outsmarting Richard Dawkins and the peanut butter guy.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• creationist
• creationism
• ray comfort
• kirk cameron
• zakir naik
• secular
• atheist
• atheism
• agnostic
• charles
• darwin
• evolution
• natural
• selection
• science
• biology
• young
• earth
• banana
• man
• dino
• reason
• logic
• rational
• response
• squad
• richard
• dawkins
• christopher
• hitchens

[JaysLogic]

Great video man. Subbed

[TheLogicalKey]

@JaysLogic Thanks mate

[Christheatheist1]

Faved and featured! As always, the BEST!

[TheLogicalKey]

@Christheatheist1 Thanks dude

[themercycrew]

dancing darwin at the end is the coooolest thing ive seen all day.. all week even.. heheh

[ozmonster1989]

@theP3rSonhuRocks No you citated facts that are totally irrelevant to what I said. It reads 'Disbelief in God by Academics'.

And no. The human ear muscles serve no function. In other apes and primates they enable movement of the ear to hear specific sounds, humans can't do this but we have the muscles left over from ancient ancestors. The dandelion has reproductive parts but reproduces asexually, again left over from ancestors. You can read about it on live science, that site you quoted.

[theP3rSonhuRocks]

@ozmonster1989 Excuse me, But you sir arrogantly placed the "fact" that 99% of scientists believe in Evolution. I hate it when people say that, so I showed you with citations and proof to the opposite. I didn't know you were so opposed to being corrected (multiple times), but I guess if you believe in Evolution, you'd get used to it.

lol, JK. Every Vestigial Organ ever mentioned has an important role in human development and functions.

[ozmonster1989]

@RedStarBelgradefan Chimps are beautiful creatures please don't insult them :-)

[ozmonster1989]

@theP3rSonhuRocks IDK why you have gone on a rant about academic belief in god, I'm talking about EVOLUTION among scientists. Despite popular belief the two are not mutually exclusive.

IMO no they haven't been 'proven essential', I could give you more but I have no doubt you'll think up a function. Did you notice that the livesci site you keep referencing has a page on vestigial organs? Is it scientifically reliable or not?

Google 'live science vestigial organs'.

[RedStarBelgradefan]

kirk cameron and ray comfort together have a brain of a chimp

[theP3rSonhuRocks]

@theP3rSonhuRocks Even Left wing Wikipedia admits that the Demographic of peoples who do not believe in a God, Atheism and Agnostics together, never exceeds 33% or so. And Christians, especially Creationists, Shy away from oppressing opinionated Evolutionist curriculum and hide their opinions, I know I did. I was Made fun of once I did said that Evolution seemed imposable. I was actually disowned by my friends and called a "Jesus freak", Talk about a double standard.

[theP3rSonhuRocks]

@theP3rSonhuRocks mates. Here is one of the Survey Results to one reporter .livescience.c o m/379-scientists-belief-god-va­ries-starkly-discipline.h t m l Up to you to decide. Disbelief in God by Academics Physics 40.8 Chemistry 26.6 Biology 41.0 Overall 37.6 Sociology 34.0 Economics 31.7 Political Science 27.0 Psychology 33.0 Overall 31.2 Believe God doesn't exist .godandscience.o r g/apologetics/why_are_scientis­ts_atheists.h t m l

[theP3rSonhuRocks]

@ozmonster1989 Yes that does include Chickens and Ostriches. I don't know their relevance, but both birds excitedly wave their wings before mating, also, it depends, as the Birds do judge their mates, who they will conceive offspring with. Maybe if A bird doesn't wave hard enough it is cast aside? IDK, I'm not a Bird. But all supposed Vestiges that You claim are proven essential to an aspect to the creature. Cut off one of those wings or one of those eyes, and see how often it...

[ozmonster1989]

@theP3rSonhuRocks Vestigiality is widely accepted in biology. They haven't been 'debunked', IMO they're harebrained responses. 'We don't totally understand genes', 'mole rats can see' (according to a website that also has a page documenting vestigial organs), 'flightless birds use wings in mating rituals' Does that include chickens? The osterich?

If you read what I wrote carefully, it said '99.9% of scientists'. So where you got the 48% figure from I haven't a clue.

[theP3rSonhuRocks]

@ozmonster1989 sorry, but If that was the "quoted" few that prove Evolution, and were that Easily debunked, you need to find out what your "Theory" teaches.