The Legend of Bhagat Singh Part 1

No description available.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• The
• Legend
• of
• Bhagat
• Singh
• Part
• 1

[jasan580]

i hate gandhi he is fool

[SinghMankaran]

@SuperSuperman600

anyways I do'nt want any argument now I am leaving you keep your stories with yourself and I keep my facts with myself

[SinghMankaran]

@SuperSuperman600

And If Tortures,rapes exist in country then none can call himself as independent that is why Sikhs demanded for Khalistan at that time Khalistan was our necessity,our right Was Bhagat Singh present at time of partition??Muslims got Pakistan Hindus Got So called secular Hindustan and what Sikhs got??Riots,massacre,Tortures,R­apes even Jews have israel minority than Sikhs East pakistan demanded bangladesh because they were tortured similarly Sikhs demanded for Khalistan

[SinghMankaran]

@SuperSuperman600

Shiv sena and others came up with slogans in amritsar "hindi hindu hindustan kacch kara kirpan pakistan" and sikhs made so much desperate efforts to make Punjabi as their state language nehru and gandhi refused to accept punjabi as punjab state language and 45 sikhs in peaceful protests were shot down by government orders now you tell me who promotes violence :/

[SinghMankaran]

@SuperSuperman600

No one talks about Hindu Extremism killing 3,000 innocents in Sikh Massacre you are taking me in wrong way I do'nt hate any hindu All Muslims and Hindus are like my brothers I am just saying the demand for Khalistan was necessary at that time it was our Right which has been taken by Nehru and Gandhi Maharaja ranjit singh created such a large sikh empire despite of having small sikh population we wanted our Full rights to be given but It was all Government who started it

[SinghMankaran]

@SuperSuperman600

A terrorist is a terrorist and terrorist for one is a freedom fighter for the other in other sense You make your own stories who cares Bhagat singh Is also a terrorist in British"s Opinion and for India he was a freedom fighter and martyr

[SuperSuperman600]

@SinghMankaran Jagjit Singh Aurora [I SUPPORT HIM] fiercely criticized the Indian National Congress leadership [NOT ALL HINDUS] following Operation Blue Star, which flushed out armed Sikh militants who had taken up positions inside the Golden Temple in Amritsar but also caused extensive damage to the holiest shrine of Sikhism. Subsequently, he spent several years as a Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha, the upper House of the Indian Parliament, for the Akali Dal, a Sikh political party.

[SuperSuperman600]

@SinghMankaran A terrorist is a terrorist, whether its congress, bhinderwala, or a pakistani. /watch?v=7_-BUZW-mtc ---> See this to know that all khalistani people were not angels. Most of them were MONSTERS, same as the congress and its goons. between radicalists like you and oppressive government its the common man which gets killed. Your viewpoint is pathetic, and people like you will drag punjab back into terrorism where innocent lives will be lost in the crossfire. SHAME ON YOU!

[SuperSuperman600]

@SinghMankaran What you call HINDUS mostly derives from middle and lower middle class people, who are well educated; the Congress the secular party gets its cadres from less educated and poor and illeterate people .....We are not separate, we defend Dharma not a race or a religion. Dharma is nothing but truth and justice....Come with little knowledge to learn more not with an belief and argue fro that point of your belief...

[SuperSuperman600]

@SinghMankaran Majority of Sikhs never wanted a separate state, although there were some genuine demands that were promised (to be fulfilled) to them by our first PM. The term Khalistan was the created by politicians, mainly Congress, to defame the Sikh community and to divert attention from their genuine demands for states (decentralization of powers).

Why are we focused on Bhindrawale....look at the other historical events prior to the Bhindrawale period.