SpaceChem In-Place Swap one reactor (1064/1/43)
Loading...
Loading...
154
views
Loading...
1:20
SpaceChem Challenge: In-Place Swap (1 reactor)by Sobtanian355 views- 0:30
SpaceChem - In-Place swap 1 reactor 943 cycles 35 symbolsby SgtMcRuff498 views
- 0:22
SpaceChem In-Place Swap 1 reactor 941 cycles 32 symbolsby SgtMcRuff1,347 views
- 1:24
SpaceChem - In-Place Swap (one reactor)by MrFoxterCZ275 views
- 0:40
SpaceChem - Challenge: In-Place Swap (ONE REACTOR) INNER VIEWby Ropuchor420 views
- 4:49
SpaceChem In-place swap 1823/1/62 solution explained.aviby Caesar51264 views
- 0:38
SpaceChem Challenge: In-Place Swap 1 reactor (slow)by Mortus77833,584 views
- 0:26
SpaceChem - Challenge: In-Place Swapby smestorp572 views
- 0:24
SpaceChem - Challenge: In-Place Swap (One reactor, slow)by christig496 views
- 0:19
SpaceChem - Challenge: In-Place Swap (3535/1/72)by MararPatrunjica124 views
- 0:18
SpaceChem - Challenge: In-Place Swap (1 reactor solution, unoptimized)by Sareia131 views
- 0:12
SpaceChem - In-Place Swap (1 Reactor)by Chesslave0116 views
- 0:10
SpaceChem - In-Place Swapby pikantchucky155 views
- 0:07
SpaceChem - Challenge: In-Place Swapby randomninen247 views
- 0:31
SpaceChem - Challenge: In-Place Swap - Single Reactor Solutionby shrikeexitium65 views
- 0:24
SpaceChem - Random Oxidesby aeroeng31415,803 views
- 0:15
SpaceChem - Challenge: In-Place Swap (1 reactor)by piemaster21722 views
- 0:14
SpaceChem - Challenge: In-Place Swap (1546/3/96)by Screwbiedooo6 views
- 0:13
SpaceChem - Challenge: In-Place Swap (1341/1/34)by MrZarquan17 views
- 0:11
SpaceChem - Challenge: In-Place Swap -- 33 symbols, 1 reactor, 1145 cyclesby prdwong488 views
I just did my 1-reactor solution, and wanted to see how others had solved it. This is extremely impressive, really good insight on only removing two of the Nitrogen bonds, and then breaking it the third one at the right time to leave the second Nitrogen free in the bonder. My approach didn't do that, and I had to circle back time and again. I'll remember some of these ideas for later.
Konklone 1 month ago
Wow! So elegant! o_O
naczelny1 4 months ago
definitely faster and less symbols than mine XD I didn't move the Methane input though and that's what made mine a lot more inefficient, less room to work with in that tiny corner lol
EkkuZakku 8 months ago
Wow, this is really good, i have need like 3 times more tiles
Naaram 1 year ago