WTC 7 "about to blow up"

9-11 was an inside job. This is just one piece of evidence among of a mountain that gets bigger everyday. Explosives cannot be placed ina building over a period of hours.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• CNN
• 9-11
• alex
• jones
• WTC7
• new
• world
• order
• conspiracy
• illuminati
• police
• state
• inside
• job
• loose
• change
• terrorstorm

[PremaritalSexXM]

I've never heard of a building demolition referred to as being "blown up"... always "demolished" or "imploded". Trust me, if the gov't wanted to blow it up, they could've spun it to say that it was because the building was unstable and needed to come down safely.

By the way, no other steel buildings endured what that building had, so don't compare it to other fires, jerkoff.

[RealWorldNewsNetwork]

Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTC complex said WTC was "pulled." The fires in WTC 7 were minimal. Firefighters were pulled out around 11:30am I believe and never entered again. Besides, no steel framed buildings (besides WTC 1 and 2) ever collapsed due to fire,ever. The government could HAVE NEVER spun it to say the building was unstable and needed to come down safely for the simple fact the it takes weeks to properly place demolitions.

[RealWorldNewsNetwork]

technically yea, i suppose...but other than the towers, no other steel buildings have collapsed "due to fire" so they have no reason to talk like that....the fires were minimal and there are other news clips of firefighters saying "they told us there blowing it up get away"

[EGRJ]

@clayrains Yes, because one anonymous person using an incorrect term in the middle of a highly emotionally charged day is proof positive explosive charges were used, instead of them a)misspeaking, or b)simply being wrong about the building blowing up.

I note you ignored my point about buildings over 40 stories being bought down by CD.

[clayrains]

@BabyQuan89 There were only two planes that crashed on 9/11 in New York. Get your basic facts straight.

[clayrains]

@Macker1283 Not to burst your bubble, but you may want to read up on 9/11 before you try to argue it... Building 7 was not hit by a plane. Not even the media or government claims a plane hit it... geesh!

[clayrains]

@EGRJ Damn straight! I know I always refer to a building as "blowing up" when it collapses. I had a huge tree limb that fell on my house one time and the roof collapsed... I mean blew up; sorry.

[clayrains]

@PremaritalSexXM Really?! See, those emergency crews didn't use the proper word for "blow up" right before the building blew up, so it didn't blow up! I love seeing debunkers have to deal with clips like these. They're avoid what's what's right in their faces like a cat when you're trying to shove their nose in shit.

[EGRJ]

@GravityBoy72 They knew it would collapse because they are firefighters. It is, literally, part of their job to know when a building is structurally unstable due to damage.

Precedent means bupkis. No building over 40 stories has ever been bought down by CD, which makes it just as "impossible" as the official story.

[EGRJ]

@RealWorldNewsNetwork No steel-framed buildings over 40 stories have ever been bought down in a controlled demo, either.

WTC 1 and 2 didn't collapse due to fire. They collapsed due to fire and a plane impact.

[bongojim420]

Inside job, no fucking doubt!

[cunnidvd]

@Macker1283 I guess that while the entire world watched no one saw the third plane crash into WTC7.

[cunnidvd]

@Macker1283 And which 50 ton mass collided into building 7? Accelerate means to change in velocity over time. The plane was not likely accelerating until the point of impact. You should learn some god damn physics yourself.