My attempt to create a power cell utlizing some of the mechanisms the free energy world has been talking about. In the end, the cell basically died once the metals finished oxidizing so nothing new was really discovered in this experiment.
Now working on crystal power cells with John Hutchison but am still a couple order of magnitudes away from an economically feasible power supply that would be useful.
You stealing the power from hydro company
solarpanels3 2 years ago
oops meant friend*, will tell all i know freely if your interested, documented all my work on forums as well. including how to charge a battery free.
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago
Much respect to you my fried, i beg to differ though, we are now seeing excess energy (more out than put in) with water fuel cells. You can start by googling Boss has LENR pass a peer review panel, all i can say is its an ion plasma energy associated with monoatomic elements, ORMES. even hydrogen on demand now reported by the tens of thousands are increasing there fuel mileage, i doubled mine. I run a joe cell. Most efficient of all.
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago
Thanks for the sensible replies freedomfighter!. As soon as anyone starts questioning the validity of stuff on here, most resort to arrogant, ignorant and irrational comments. Regarding some of the stuff you mentioned, osmotic membranes are what you must be referring to a few comments ago. This is the basis for hydrogen fuel cells and is now well known. There is no net gain in energy though. It is merely a conversion, (pressure vs charge), taking place. Respect! and yes, Peace!!!
dividebyN 2 years ago
By the way helpmedaddi this is also why Hutchinson had levitation. And why metal has fallen apart, covalent bonds (electrons) hold everything together. And they are directly related to gravity.
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago
part 1: it has recently been discovered that water pushed though a small orfacic can eject electrons from atoms and used as a current, so it is not imposable the there very thing electrons are can not do the same (electricity) water ionises at room temperature, this is a fact, this ionisation is the removal of electrons,
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago
part 2: electrons are directly related to gravity, this is why a heavy molecule can hang in our atmosphere. Lightning is the clue, the negative electrons are attracted to the positive ions, positive ions are missing electrons, the end result is rain (water molecules) falling back down once again bloated with electrons.
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago
People would even debunk my videos. I think only seeing it for ones self really works, or the hundredth monkey affect. Again watch the war on coldfusion here when you get a chance. 100s of scientist have replicated it but the suppression is to much to get the info out there, it is in science books and peer review panels. The only way we will have it is grass routes way. We can agree to disagree, time will prove me right. Peace.
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago
I'm not going to start arguing over this. I'm also not going to devote time to what is clearly impossible. As for suppression, the world is full of scientists, academics, universities and institutions that would do anything to be the first to utilise, prove and PATENT anything of this nature. To mention suppression only substantiates the psychology OF suppression! Good luck though and as I say, back up your claims by a video of them. No-one can de-bunk 'raw' evidence. cya!
dividebyN 2 years ago
Well freedomfighter, I commend you and your percevierance. You will have to take my word for it that I have thoroughly researched what you are claiming. There are a few points which I find difficult to relate to your claims. The valence of hydrogen is 2 and oxygen is 1 (when nuclearly bound in its natural h20 state). What you are claiming is, somehow you are altering the outer shell electrons resulting in either a 'free' electron escaping or becoming available. This can-not be possible.
dividebyN 2 years ago