Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

C02 reductions hurt economy

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
958 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 21, 2007

Canadians will criticize the government for doing too much to tackle climate change once the economic impact is felt from reducing greenhouse gases, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said.

-


In a year-end interview with CBC's Peter Mansbridge, Harper spoke of the "challenge" of implementing the first phases of the mandatory emission reduction targets on industry because of the "very real costs" on the economy.

-


"There is a reason why previous governments have avoided at all levels setting mandatory emission targets." Harper said.

-


"As soon as you're dedicated to actually reducing emissions, that imposes costs on the economy. It imposes them in the short run."

-


While he said the costs will be manageable, they will provoke some reaction.

-


"And I'd ask your viewers to think of that whenever they have other people out there saying we should be doing more. Because once we start ... these things start biting, the criticism we're going to be getting is that we're doing too much."

-


Harper said he is already starting to hear the first cries from industry and the provinces about the upcoming emissions targets.

Public inquiry not a sure thing

-


Harper was also asked about the public inquiry into the dealings between former prime minister Brian Mulroney and German businessman Karlheinz Schreiber.

-


Harper has named University of Waterloo president David Johnston to define the parameters for the inquiry. A final report to the prime minister is due by Jan. 11.

-


But the prime minister suggested that an inquiry is not a sure thing.

-


"I frankly have never wanted to make this call myself. I don't think Canadians would necessarily see me or this government as terribly objective on this matter," Harper said.

-


But when asked what might happen if Johnston advises him not to have an inquiry into the affair, Harper responded: "I think whatever advice David Johnston gives us, it's almost a certainty that that is the advice we will follow because from the beginning I have not wanted to be in a position of adjudicating what should or shouldn't be done with former prime ministers.

PM admits to feeling 'awkward'

-


"I feel extremely awkward about that. I feel particularly awkward in the case of Mr. Mulroney."

-


Harper was also asked about the recent isotopes shortage crisis and the government's decision to overrule Canada's nuclear regulator and re-start the reactor at Chalk River, Ont., which produces the medical isotopes.

-


He rejected he had made a partisan attack when he referred to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission as "Liberal appointed." He said he was just expressing his frustration with the regulatory body's decision.

-


The shutdown had created a shortage of the nuclear material used for life-saving diagnostic scans and for medical imaging for fractures, cancers and heart conditions

-


"I don't believe the actions of the nuclear commission were motivated by partisan considerations," Harper said. "I do believe the course of action contemplated was extremely ill-advised. An appalling use of authority and judgment. And one that the government had to deal with."

Brought to you Mediascrape

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You know what else will have an "economic impact"?

    - Higher frequency of superstorms

    - Rising sea levels overtaking coastal cities/salinating fresh water aquifers

    - Droughts destroying arable lands

    - And widespread war due to famines/natural disasters.

    Our CO2 emissions are also growing yearly. We're actually moving backwards, and the so-called "point of no return" after which we get a runaway greenhouse effect is now expected within the next 10 years. EVERYONE NEEDS TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

  • What in your view is a credible economist seeing that economists are infamous for having widely divergent views on the same issue...

  • Harper can't even legislate Trans Fats that are killing us let alone CO2. He would rather Municipal Governments attempt to take on Global Chains like McDonalds etc......A REAL conservative ass dragging LEADER!

  • There is no credible economist who backs Harper on this point. All credible economists say the exact opposite: doing nothing about climate change is the worst economic policy.

  • ! Just as the impact of C02 cuts may be disproportionate among countries (in Canada for instance because of the oil sands) so to will the effects of global warming. Tough luck Canada...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more