Science of Love
Top Comments
All Comments (85)
-
@ImperatorDerGalaxis You make it seem as though because it can be understood that it is therefore meaningless. In my opinion the scientific perspective of love is way more romantic, and more individualized than the more traditional notions of "love". Though, it is understandable how some people are put off by the mystery aspect being gone.
-
That's a very good point, but the science is the same, except you end up cheating nature if you think about it... but we're not likely to go extinct any time soon so that doesn't matter.
-
@ziba89 Ventral tegmental area
-
hey what's the name of the brain part @ 0:53 ? i cant catch it
-
nice one
-
MAKE MOAR!!!!!
-
LOL...love is nothing more but chemicals...enough said.
-
@coocoobumbum yeah!!!, me to!!!!
-
i dont understand why people want to put something supernatural in love. love is well explaned by science, ist no enugh that the garden is butiful do we have to belive that theres fearys under it.
-
fucking campers! LOL
Yeah, that's love... obsessive thinking :)
I read the description, and the first thing i shouted out was 'BABY DON'T HURT ME!'
coocoobumbum 1 year ago 32
"Anthropologist Helen Fisher teaches us what love looks like in the brain."
We all know what it looks like in the pants.
RadarGuidedVermin 1 year ago 20