OJ's son Jason ... is HE the guilty one?

If OJ Simpson is innocent, then WHO is GUILTY? This presentation was made at Kent State University in 2004... and it reveals compelling evidence that Jason Simpson may have committed the "crime of the century." Andy Rooney - you owe me a cool million.
Sorry for the poor quality ... ppt file converted to mpeg :(

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• OJ
• Simpson
• not
• guilty
• Jason
• murder
• suspect
• evidence
• means
• motive
• opportunity
• nichole
• ron
• goldman
• cover-up
• truth

[mjmitch33]

@blastofftheshow Watching lies like that video is not real truth. The people that flipped their stories after they told the cops something else to make money are a joke. The real truth is Jason was at work and went with his lady to watch tv and was not alone until after 2am. Just like Ron Shipp who was the person on the stand that talked to OJ after and confronted him in front of the jury. OJ's blood,OJ shoes,OJ gloves,OJ hair ,OJ lies.. You need to look at testimony not made for money videos.

[blastofftheshow]

@mjmitch33 watch oj simpson guilty but not of murder....I will tell you jason did it but i think oj knew but he didn't say anything that is why he tried to escape.....I truly feel in my heart he did not do it

[mjmitch33]

@blastofftheshow I think the chance at justice was thrown away by the first trial. Anyone who does not believe he did it is usually very young and unaware of the huge amount of evidence or from LA and brainwashed into thinking that all the evidence could have been planted. However, you cannot plant two types of blood if you only collected blood in one tube. The clothes and shoes were items OJ owned and wore previously and he was lying before we even knew she was dead to cover his tracks.

[blastofftheshow]

@mjmitch33 I really don't think oj did it but america needs justice

[mjmitch33]

any documented incidents of violence between Jason and Nicole? There were nine with her and OJ. Any of Jasons blood at the scene?

[mjmitch33]

@Stardust607 How did it get blood on it? Blood without edta? OJ matching dna,tested in three facilities... I know your uneducated thought process may have trouble with this but the science of dna is freeing many now. It is freeing those even with the bad collecting and transfer process they used in the early years of dna. You know why? You cannot plant matching blood before a murder unless you have access to that blood prior to the killings.. you need to get over your anger with the white man.

[Stardust607]

@1tmproductions Glove was planted by Mark Fuhrman, a Detective who disliked OJ and was trying to help the case against him.

[Stardust607]

Forget about the glove, the glove was planted by Det. Mark Fuhrman.

[1tmproductions]

I thought we finished this over a month ago whe you couldn't explai certain "doubts" i raised. Now your respnse is "it's a rope". Well son I suggest you try to wrap your head around the concept "prove beyond a reaonable doubt". You talking about he owned the gloves, pictures and recepits..Wow..Maybe he owned a pair like that but is there a vin number in a gloove? Come on a month later and still the same stufff. Don't see why you are writing me you can't convince me of anything.

[mjmitch33]

@1tmproductions its a rope son, with every strand of string it becomes more and more impossible for all the facts to point to one person. Had they only found a drop of OJ's blood and the shoes not been his size.. the puzzle would have fallen apart. However the shoes he owned,the gloves we have pictures and receipts,the hair matched his hat,the fiber matched his Bronco,the blood pattern matched his injuries,the trail matched his path,the murder fit his schedule,the lies fit his state of mind.