Yes your right. When taken with a grain of salt and all in good fun. It's fine.
Unfortunately this kind of thinking allows several people to be conned and tricked when they take it seriously. It's fine for the wealthy but it hurts the middle strugglers.
I am also overly concerned with a true view of the world. As best a one that I can attain. Plus loving astronomy makes me abhor astrology.
Well I'm still interested to see how yoru studies go. I'll be keeping a look out.
There is plenty of room on the planet for everyone to have an opinion and believe what they want to believe in life. I'm not in an ER risking human life. Though scientifically, placebos DO have a surprising success rate .. which is why drug companies provide double-blind studies. Both sides can not know if they have the actual medication or not. The human mind is quite powerful, medically. I have appreciated your sharp mind. Thank you for the rich discussion. Christopher
Yea psychology... Is sociologies and neuroscience's dirty love child. It's not a real science, neuroscience is.
I'm not asking you to prove it to me. I'm just saying that there currently is no evidence to accept the claims of astrology seriously.
If their is no real truth in your claims are you really helping people or hindering them? From the sounds of it you are quite serious and I think you actually believe what you say.
If someone needed antibiotics would you give them a placebo?
I don't have faith in the government's approach to their study, and frankly I don't want the power of astrology in their hands. We could go on and on about this .. and really, I'm in the business of helping others not proving to skeptics. To each their own ... Most schools of psychology begin PURELY on theory and after several case studies with clients prove their theories. Freud actually thought the brain had an Id, Ego and SuperEgo and he dominated psychology. I'm proud of my work.
I can't seem to think of anything that was accepted (merit and acceptence differ?) before evidence arrived. Secondary endosymbiosis for example, the person who theorised it in the early 20's was laughed at, but in a nice way of course because the claim he was making wasn't crazy just lacked evidince
70 years later it turned out he was right.
And of course all you have is time and space. hehehe. By the way your work if passing peer reivew would win you a Nobel and great scientific acclaim.
As far as I know, I'm the only person out there trying to gather statistical evidence. It takes time to develop scientific studies with integrity .. as you well know. Nonetheless, people find value with what I do. There are many "theories" in life that receive plenty of merit BEFORE evidence arrives .. as you also well know. So at least give me the space and time to prove my theories... as you likely would any researcher, yes?
Give me some time and I'll dig this back up. I can't remember if it's in a college text book or in my independent research. I went to college for 5 years and could have minored in science .. i'm a geek at heart.
Also the gravitational affect of your desk and computer is most likely greater than the gravitational affect of Jupiter.
95 million years ago something sucked out the oxygen from the earths oceans, the resut was a mass extinction. Geologists suspected the culprit might have been undersea volcanoes but they lacked a conclusive link. Now two marine geologists have... Nature Podcast: 17 July @ 18:33
You need evidence before your claims can be acepted otherwise they are merely fiction.
I am yet to read anything about this "magical" force gravity has on our emotions. What is this force? What statistical method did you use to conduct your study?
I'm intrested to see this substantial evidence.
I am a fanboy of astronomy (despite bieng a biology major) and I have indeed studied the stars, I have come across no peer reviewed evidence to support the claims of astologers.
Nor have I come across any papers on nuerology to suggest your claims of gravity effecting emotions.
You are describing measurement of the effect gravity has on an object. Gravity itself is still an invisible "magical" force that science has yet to uncover. Astrology is the same way, we are measuring the invisible affect it has on human emotion. I do have substantial evidence behind what I claim in these videos. In fact, Soulgarden is in development of a system right now that will scientifically measure our claims for later publishing. Have you ever studied astrology scientifically?
Yes your right. When taken with a grain of salt and all in good fun. It's fine.
Unfortunately this kind of thinking allows several people to be conned and tricked when they take it seriously. It's fine for the wealthy but it hurts the middle strugglers.
I am also overly concerned with a true view of the world. As best a one that I can attain. Plus loving astronomy makes me abhor astrology.
Well I'm still interested to see how yoru studies go. I'll be keeping a look out.
daymyth 3 years ago
There is plenty of room on the planet for everyone to have an opinion and believe what they want to believe in life. I'm not in an ER risking human life. Though scientifically, placebos DO have a surprising success rate .. which is why drug companies provide double-blind studies. Both sides can not know if they have the actual medication or not. The human mind is quite powerful, medically. I have appreciated your sharp mind. Thank you for the rich discussion. Christopher
SoulGardenTV 3 years ago
Yea psychology... Is sociologies and neuroscience's dirty love child. It's not a real science, neuroscience is.
I'm not asking you to prove it to me. I'm just saying that there currently is no evidence to accept the claims of astrology seriously.
If their is no real truth in your claims are you really helping people or hindering them? From the sounds of it you are quite serious and I think you actually believe what you say.
If someone needed antibiotics would you give them a placebo?
daymyth 3 years ago
I don't have faith in the government's approach to their study, and frankly I don't want the power of astrology in their hands. We could go on and on about this .. and really, I'm in the business of helping others not proving to skeptics. To each their own ... Most schools of psychology begin PURELY on theory and after several case studies with clients prove their theories. Freud actually thought the brain had an Id, Ego and SuperEgo and he dominated psychology. I'm proud of my work.
SoulGardenTV 3 years ago
I can't seem to think of anything that was accepted (merit and acceptence differ?) before evidence arrived. Secondary endosymbiosis for example, the person who theorised it in the early 20's was laughed at, but in a nice way of course because the claim he was making wasn't crazy just lacked evidince
70 years later it turned out he was right.
And of course all you have is time and space. hehehe. By the way your work if passing peer reivew would win you a Nobel and great scientific acclaim.
daymyth 3 years ago
As far as I know, I'm the only person out there trying to gather statistical evidence. It takes time to develop scientific studies with integrity .. as you well know. Nonetheless, people find value with what I do. There are many "theories" in life that receive plenty of merit BEFORE evidence arrives .. as you also well know. So at least give me the space and time to prove my theories... as you likely would any researcher, yes?
SoulGardenTV 3 years ago
Give me some time and I'll dig this back up. I can't remember if it's in a college text book or in my independent research. I went to college for 5 years and could have minored in science .. i'm a geek at heart.
SoulGardenTV 3 years ago
Also the gravitational affect of your desk and computer is most likely greater than the gravitational affect of Jupiter.
95 million years ago something sucked out the oxygen from the earths oceans, the resut was a mass extinction. Geologists suspected the culprit might have been undersea volcanoes but they lacked a conclusive link. Now two marine geologists have... Nature Podcast: 17 July @ 18:33
You need evidence before your claims can be acepted otherwise they are merely fiction.
daymyth 3 years ago
I am yet to read anything about this "magical" force gravity has on our emotions. What is this force? What statistical method did you use to conduct your study?
I'm intrested to see this substantial evidence.
I am a fanboy of astronomy (despite bieng a biology major) and I have indeed studied the stars, I have come across no peer reviewed evidence to support the claims of astologers.
Nor have I come across any papers on nuerology to suggest your claims of gravity effecting emotions.
daymyth 3 years ago
You are describing measurement of the effect gravity has on an object. Gravity itself is still an invisible "magical" force that science has yet to uncover. Astrology is the same way, we are measuring the invisible affect it has on human emotion. I do have substantial evidence behind what I claim in these videos. In fact, Soulgarden is in development of a system right now that will scientifically measure our claims for later publishing. Have you ever studied astrology scientifically?
SoulGardenTV 3 years ago