AQo vs. 9To at the 2008 WSOP
Loading...
1,304
Loading...
Uploader Comments (beaston7272)
see all
All Comments (6)
-
mathematically: was it a correct call with ten 9 offsuited?
-
You wrote:
>> btw 9T was only 37% preflop and 6% post...:P
Actually, it's 36%-37% pre-flop going up heads-up with the AQo.
But I was saying if you DIDN'T know the other guy was holding AQo, it WOULD be 49% pre-flop for the guy holding 9To.
And, of course, it's 6% post-flop. Trust me. We're using the same calculator. ;)
-
10 9..idiot
-
just imagine if would have been PHIL HELLMUTH!
I would loved to watch that,.....
Loading...
Whoa!
Runner runner straight with only a 49% pre-flop winning percentage and only a 36% winning percentage heads-up against with the AQo.
See, this is an example of what blows about no-limit texas hold'em. When you get hurt, it hurts BAD!
And when hands like this happen online, forget about! You really start to question whether online poker sites are rigged.
LOL!
No-limit hold'em clearly equals bowel-liquifyingly high variance! ;D
Tuxster3 2 years ago
hahaha...
"No-limit hold'em clearly equals bowel-liquifyingly high variance! ;D "
That is the best description I've ever read...and it's so true..lol
beaston7272 2 years ago