Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Forehand: Tennis Coaching Point Analysis

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
18,548
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 17, 2008

http://www.hi10spro.blogspot.com presents how to analyze a shot. I like to do this for my students. It's a good reminder of where they were as well as a good aid. I make an one minute clip for them.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (hi10spro)

  • Poor movement, off balance on most shots and taking the ball at completely wrong height. Buck up your ideas son!

  • @atalayapark good analysis, what's your background?

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • dont think about this shit when u hit.....your off balance cuz all that analytical stuff is going through your head.

  • Well the audio is messed up. But I assume you were saying something about how his non-dominant elbow needs to come back so that it does not hinder rotation.

  • I would never advise to COPY from A to Z a shot, because they'll obviously mess up somewhere. But, there's nothing which says you cannot mold your shot around it and get the basic principles done.

    Federer has a weird mix of classical and modern forehand. It gives this high follow-through, this extent arm and the peculiar racket take back.

    The idea is to do something efficient, safe and feels great. How it looks is simply the result of the preceding things.

  • ru a lawyer?

  • The shot is very complex. have you looked at the video--his shoulder opens, then freezes, the racquet starts perpendicular to the ground, then swings out--a very long impact point, then it turns over. it's very difficult to do. But he is Roger

  • Roger is the GOAT remember that

  • he is the GOAT.

    Nadal matches up well with Roger, but as you can see, longevity with Nadal is an issue, his game is hell on his body.

    Roger has one hole--high backhands, but not too many people can get to it.

  • You can say he made some, but if we compare his shot to any other player, we see he is consistantly superior and remember how commentators qualify him. They say he's better when it counts. Numbers tell he won 15 GS out of 5.

    The problem was in his HEAD and on the other side. The guy was NADAL in each of these games.

    He got closer and closer on each try to win and last time he won...with amazing forehand winners and a great net play.

    The problem isn't consistancy, it's him VS Nadal the problem

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more