Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

www.uk-fags.co.uk - support the fight

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,367
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 26, 2006

support the fight against uk government proposals, which contivue to erode freedom of choice in the uk. visit www.uk-fags.co.uk

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • freedom aof fucking speecch man i love it smoke the fas ciggerettes whatever you want to call them its brilliant fuck them that dont like it.

  • yeah u havnt got much of a point wf fag being homophobic slang. cos at teh end of the day america is thousands of miles away and no1 in britain thinks the word fag is offensive to use it jsut means ciggerette.

  • ARE u being serious.

    1stly, the name is terrible, you do know thats now a homophobic slang insult in american culture, and moving into british culture.

    2ndly, Passive smoking!?!?!?! Being able to breathe in pubs, train stations, clubs and restaraunts is the best thing that has happened in legislation last year.

    3rdly, its your problem, and yes i say that because its a drug, its addictive and kills. So you shouldn't be advertising it anywhere but your own home.

    I will never touch a cigarette!

  • Tam, you're the man!

    Catchy wee ditty to highlight the hyocritical wankers' gradual move to a police state.

    Most folks just cannae see the transition to fascism.

    14 million people.. they should all be taking to the streets.

    cheers chief!!

    astro

  • Pity you cant prove any passive smoking deaths! Neither can any Mp who voted for the ban or any of the so called "health experts" that promoted this ban! Why can no one prove any? Because there arent!

  • Well said .... you idiot! I wonder what your reaction will be as this government gradually enforce their ideas on everyone, don't worry your one is coming and who will stand up for you then. If you don't like smoky areas .... STAY OUT OF THEM.

  • Sounds like you misinterpreted my post. The government only needs to step in to save the stupid from themselves. Alternatively, let them kill themselves, but not at the expense of the non-smoking tax-payer (and this expense includes passive smoking of course).

  • If you're okay with a government "stepping in" to tell you what is best for you then you'd be okay with a government telling you what to eat, what religion to practice, how many hours you're allowed to watch tv, etc.

  • Most people start smoking while they're too young and stupid not to. If people can't be relied on to make the (obviously) right choice themselves, the government has to step in. It's even sadder that people are so selfish as to not endure a little hardship (smoking in a designated area) to save future generations from this disease.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more