Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

A Good Question for Professor Richard Dawkins

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
10,753
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 30, 2009

HI! Ok, so I've had some requests to post the question asked by the audience member. The question was essentially, (I'm paraphrasing) "Given the strength of the theory of evolution, if we were to find a human skeleton in the same strata of the earth as we might find a dinosaur's bones, would this not be evidence for the possibility of time-travel, rather than a point against evolution?"

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (bdk1234567)

  • I can't hear the question. Is this in Toronto?

  • Sorry about the sound quality, the poor old gent was a bit infirm but had a great statement/question. The question was essentially, (I'm paraphrasing) "Given the strength of the theory of evolution, if we were to find a human skeleton in the same strata of the earth as we might find a dinosaur's bones, would this not be evidence for the possibility of time-travel, rather than a point against evolution?"

Top Comments

  • Fantastic question, clicked on this link ready to see some creationist mumbo jumbo, and oh what a pleasant suprise.

see all

All Comments (43)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Sylvine

    Absolutely - such a finding would be a good reason to re-examine the theory of evolution, IF we first ruled out all sorts of other factors, and even then, the theory would still hold; we would simply end up with an anomaly which needed to be explained.

  • That's awesome. I asked him once about Ray Kurzweil and his view on the future of human evolution taking a technological twist.

    He said it was interesting science fiction.

  • the person asking the question sounds just like kermit the frog

  • It's an interesting question when stripped of its initial entertainment value. The essence of the question is: Would a singular finding that appears to contradict the theory of evolution be significant enough against the mountains of evidence for it to actually shake it?

    Given how solid it is, I'm inclined to think that it wouldn't. But it sure would be great fodder for creationists! =)

    ~Sylv

  • @wspol624 He basically said, "That's a good point. I hadn't thought of that but that would certainly be something to consider but it hasn't happened and it's not going to happen."

  • Hahaha, brilliant.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more