Sampras-Federer

2003

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• tenis

[rogeristhelord]

i love the irony of them talking about whether sampras record of 13/14 will last

not knowing that its greatest challenger is down the other end

[est1973]

This match was in 2001, not 2003.

[kwl189]

Federer and Sampras would beat Nadal with incredible easy. I mean look at the points here. Nearly every time someone is at the net. There are no such matches anymore at Wimbledon. That for me says it all about how slow grass has become. Nadal would still lose to Fed every day of the week.

[splendid1000]

@hencar2

LOL ! Not on fast grass or fast 90's style US Open hard court . Both have been slowed down dramatically since Nadal started winning. Sampras would absolutely destroy Nadal on 90s grass and hard court lol.

[Thutmosis7]

You can say fed also benefit from the court slowing down a lil bit.

[Thutmosis7]

@DjKlimaxPeru Grass is not slow as clay. Stop making excuses to why he won wimble. W started to slow down from 2001 and probably one of the reason why sampras didn't won again. But it's still play alot fast, but not lighting quick like before 2001.

[DjKlimaxPeru]

@hencar2 I don't think so, maybe in clay but not in grass... Rafa won wimbledon because grass nowadays is slower and similar to clay...

[bpstacey]

you can tell mcenroe was going for sampras by the way he is talking

[thirsten89]

@emokhtar What do you think you are, some kind of prophet?

[thirsten89]

@hencar2 On grass no way he would have. No one comes in against nadal, no can go in as well as sampras could. Sampras would take nadal out

[MrTonyInchpractice]

soil

[misterlonely1446]

haha I love Federer's cheeky smiles....no homo