Jim Fetzer 9/11 - evidence for unconventional weapons (2)

Dr. Fetzer gives supporting evidence to his hypothesis that unconventional weapons may have been used to cause the devastation of the world trade center on september 11'th 2001. Recorded at the Columbus Metropolitan Library on 2/17/2007.

scholars for 911 truth government conspiracy alex jones patriot movement noam chomsky left gatekeeper federal reserve cia nsa fbi fema contracts money david rockefeller foundation america george bush dick cheney imf world bank united nations civil liberties mysteries movement grass roots oklahoma city kennedy assassination northwoods operation controlled demolition evidence pentagon wtc 7 world trade center twin towers new york washington dc shanksville pa norad stand down drills united airlines flight 93 port authority pnac cfr who wto imf project for new american century council on foreign relations bilderberg international monetary fund tim osman osama bin laden 767 757 boeing thermite thermate ground zero first responder nyfd peace federal emergency management association atf

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• jim
• fetzer

[andyk369]

what about the molten steel? proven video fakery, evidence of thermate, what about the norad stand down? what about the fact that the nist report is dislogic and distortion? what about the fact that the "hijackers" were incapable of flying even a single propeller plane? what about the fact that 6 of them are still alive and have been interviewed on tv? what about the laws of physics?

[lexxellent]

Anybody can look up the formula for falling objects and see for themselves that what Jim Fetzer is talking about is logical. If you don't already know about something it's hard to believe it is a possibility, which has nothing to do with whether or not it is possible. We are limited by the boundaries of our education and experience and seldom venture outside that limit. Good luck Jim!!!

[SablePhoenixBlu1]

@concussedcarneous I agree.

[concussedcarneous]

name-calling means nothing. these folks are true heros;they have dedicated their entire time to finding out THE TRUTH that what the government's presented in its official report is an absurd fallacious LIE. do you know you can't change the laws of nature? the melting point of steel is 2800 degrees. NO steel-frame or high-rise buildings have ever been brought down because of fires. temperatures due to fire don't get hot enough for buildings to collapse. you don't have to be a working engineer....

[SablePhoenixBlu1]

@andyk369 What about, the silent jets, soaring a bit above sea level?

What about the alledged crack shown on WTC l, which is too tiny for a jet?

[SablePhoenixBlu1]

@concussedcarneous Is there something wrong, or an error in truth? The label "truth-er" is for what reason/intention?

So, someone that says Disney Land is make-believe is a 'truth-er'?

Opposed to what, a 'Li-ar'?

[newsmanbluesman]

giga-watts from haarp.. not bytes

[concussedcarneous]

attack*

[concussedcarneous]

why is it these retard believers attach a truth-er for his/her job title?

[pookzta]

Why do we have a philosopher presenting an engineer's work (and distorting it)? Dr. Wood has never proposed "laser beams from space" as being a cause. She talks about directed energy combined with field effects like those produced by the Hutchison Effect.

-Abe

[RedBloodReign]

"Gigabyte" is not a measurement of energy... ugh...

Thermite can be tailored to be explosive.

The theory is thermite was placed on the central columns, therefore it's perfectly logical that the inside would collapse inwards and the outside "netting" would remain, towards the bottom. Fits the theory beautifully.

The dust was almost certainly acidic, eating away car paint. Also those cars were could have been crushed when they were moved out of the way. When were those pictures taken?

[gunthaarz]

see the video with the russian military ex nuclear responsible. He has really detailed logical explanation for the dust, the molten metal etc.

BTW: was this recording done in columbus ohio ?