Rand Paul Speaking About The EPA

Please help fund this amazing Ron Paul "Oath" Ad in the top Iowa Newspapers before the January 3rd caucus NOW!

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?338013-Iowa-quot-Oath-quot-Ad-Cam...

http://twrocked.chipin.com/iowa-oath-ad-campaign-chip-in

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• rand paul
• ron paul
• EPA

[cervantessssssssssss]

@seantbird09 what? nationalisation? How do special interests bargain in that process?, most current corporations would go bankrupt or at least not enjoy their current exploitative profits. Small business and manufacturing would explode along w opportunity for workers.. Banks would begin to recapitalize. Dow would hover around it's historic 5000 instead of unsustained profits and collapse. Wheres the downside? other than a handful of over extended private investors?

[seantbird09]

@cervantessssssssssss that's called corporatism.

[cervantessssssssssss]

You are so insultive everytime I say something you don't agree w.. this is my last response. Free Market is an idea that does not work. It's been tried, it's failed.. horrendously. W/o gov. intervention we'd have feudalism and modern day slavery all over again.. Your Reaganomics BS has already proven itself a failure. And I can imagine at least 200 mil underemployed/underpaid americans who would agree.

[IJUSTLOVETURTLES]

@cervantessssssssssss You aren't even making coherent points anymore. In a free market economy where suppliers and consumers can freely enter and leave business arrangements, supply and demand will cause capital to flow to where it can best be used based on investors and suppliers reacting to changes in price. Poverty in Africa is going away in countries that maximize freedom and lingering under totalitarian regimes that have tight controls over the market. Research Botswana vs. Zimbabwe.

[cervantessssssssssss]

@IJUSTLOVETURTLES Theres 2 choices, bring wages in developing countries up.. or continue to bring wages in developed countries down.. in your idea of a 'free market' which choice would those who own the resources and means of production choose? Profit over equality, Profit over society, Profit over famine. Sach's derivitaves caused starvation of millions.. does he care? Wiping out of resources and wildlife.. do they care? Pushing the button to nuke a rival country.. do they care?

[cervantessssssssssss]

@IJUSTLOVETURTLES lol.. how is it factually wrong that outsourcing the foundation of an economy, firing hundreds of millions of $20+ p/h in exchange for $2 p/day workers elsewhere not nation destroying? Look what the IMF and World bank did to south america.. to africa and others. The western world is not out of the brink of financial and economic collapse.. the world is not yet out of the possiblity of global depression, and you state the continued path is the way to go.

[IJUSTLOVETURTLES]

@cervantessssssssssss I'm sorry, but yet again, you're just factually wrong. Show me any examples of unmitigated capitalism destroying nations. I can show you Singapore and Hong Kong, both of which had free market capitalism for decades and saw steady GDP growth that didn't manifest prior to it.

[cervantessssssssssss]

@IJUSTLOVETURTLES Fact is, Capitalism and Socialism left to their own destroys itself.. a 'Hybrid' is needed. Capitalism has brought the world close to collapse, it starves millions and destroys nations.. now is the time for drastic gov. regulations at a global lvl.

[IJUSTLOVETURTLES]

@cervantessssssssssss Getting rid of for-profit institutions would kill any innovation and shackle the economy. Sure, you'd kill corporatism, but you'd be left with pure socialism. It's funny how you use the words "fascism" and "regulation" in contrast with one another, because both fascism and communism involve tight government control over markets and that's not what Rand Paul or any libertarian wants.

[cervantessssssssssss]

@IJUSTLOVETURTLES an ideology of social partnership expressed at the national level; a relatively centralized and concentrated system of interest groups; and voluntary and informal coordination of conflicting objectives through continuous political bargaining between interest groups, state bureaucracies and political parties.*

3 parts to the official definition of corporatism, if you know rand paul's views then you knew OFC that I was referring to interest groups..