Are you one of the many health and medical professionals who believe that muscle testing is just a lot of nonsense? Have you ever been "tested" by someone and you know they were just trying to sell you a product by applying different pressures? Many, if not most of the practitioners who utilize this technique may fit into this category of bad testers and some (or possibly many) are most certainly charlatans. "THE TECHNIQUE OF MUSCLE TESTING, WHEN PROPERLY LEARNED AND CORRECTLY PRACTICED, MAY BE THE SINGLE MOST VALUABLE METHOD IN EXISTENCE FOR GATHERING INFORMATION ABOUT A PATIENT OR CLIENT." David Getoff, Naturopath
To purchase, go to http://www.elitealternatives.net
Where does the muscle testing come in to play? Video is worthless.
Tonesnob72 1 month ago
This vid tells me nothing. I want to get this right. I believe it works because I self test e.g. going through a pack of cards and I get around 2 thirds correct so there must be something in it BUT why only 2 thirds? Why not 3 thirds? Also the techiques given everywhere are useless with me.The finger loop will still not break since both hands are weak. I have found a different way but it still takes a lot of awareness in how it feels. I need really provably strong methods to try. Help please?
Samua3 2 years ago
I'll tell you there's lot's o shysters out there. Why not just try it for yourself. You don't need an expert and sure don't need "double-blind" to affirm the results for yourself. It's a subtle technique that requires practice and different ways of doing it work better for different people
ycmgh 2 years ago
At least one can get an unbiased result. Actually, if a double blind test would show that AK works, I would have no problem changing my opinion on this. It´s anoying that skeptics are always pictured as the narrow minded. Believers will never change their mind, even if scientific evidence is against their belief. Interesting or not? Who is open minded?
I have not yet seen any real evidence that AK work, but it would be amazing if such evidence could be produced.
skakke74 2 years ago
Well, I guess that proves it.
ycmgh 2 years ago
Yes, there is a lot of info. Both for and against. What can we trust? I do not understand the last part of your comment, sorry. Can you refrase? The burden of evidence is not on my side. The AK people has to prove it´s working, not the skeptics proving it´s not. That´s the way it works.
So far all I can find is tests that are in my opinion biased.
A double blind test where not the AK people nor the skeptics can infuence the outcome will tell the truth.
AK always fails such tests...
skakke74 2 years ago
Do a search on applied kinesiology. There's info. If you're intent is to "prove" that it's fraudulent, when just keep "believing" what you do.
cheers,
y.c.
ycmgh 2 years ago
Ycmgh
When you talk about scientific evidense. Who is actually conducting these tests? Is it the AK people themself?
If a mobile telephone manufacturer conducts a test on the health risks from extensive use of mobile phones. What would the result be from this research?
When bible archaeologists dig for evidence that would determine the historically correctness of the bible, what will they find?
skakke74 2 years ago
Please give me a link to spesific scientific evidence.
By double blind testing I mean that the person performing the test , and the person being tested should not know what substanse is being tested. This would eliminate any idemotoric effects.
skakke74 2 years ago
Hey! I'm from Fairfield, but Maha's aren't the only one's out there muscle testing.
ycmgh 2 years ago