John Coleman, the founder of The Weather Channel and a nationally recognized speaker against the global warming movement, spoke at Missouri State University on Sept. 17.
Ask me if I do believe in man caused warming,I´d say, ´I don´t know´ ask me if I believe that man influences global warming to a certain degree, I´d say ´yes´. Why? Well this man has shown himself that Co2 and temperature co-relate, they rise and fall together. We have cars now, and a ton more people than ever before on this earth,all adding up to the amount of Co2 produced. Since Co2 and temperature co-relate it is no big step to say that man influences the temperature on earth.
John is correct. Fred Bailey has discovered the underlying nataural mechanism that regulates Sunspot production and Climate Change, there is a connection between them but Sunspots have nothing to do with Climate Change, Google solarchords and you will see for yourself
It was Gore's movie that prompted me to look into the facts for myself.
If CO2 does indeed lag temperature (which the data proves unequivocally) then there is no more debate. Man-caused global warming is an invention of left-wing nut cases, nothing more.
If global warming is a scam, John Coleman is 100% retard. every season v r witnessing the effect of global warming, in d form of heavy rains and increase in temperature and melting ice and increase in sea levels. now this MF John comes and says it is a scam. WTF is wrong with him. he shud be mentally abnormal.
Deniersuse sources like john coleman when coleman has only a TV broadcast background and his college major was in journalism. Is he a respected credible expert? Not hardly!
It's because deniers have no credible sources to support their opinions. Although Wiki isn't a source of scientific information they do provide accurate position statements of the respected scientific institutions. Here's a link.
Think about this: CO2 isn't the problem the Extra CO2 is the problem. CO2 gets in the air and the gets absorbed by plants it's called the carboncycle
But the extra CO2 that we get in the air by burning oil doesn't take part of the Carbon cycle. It has been taken away from it millions of years ago when it got formed. And now we are releasing in 1 year what has been assimilated to plants/ oil in 400 years. Think about it. The carbon cycle can't handle it.
"This argument has been disputed quite vigorously." Of course, but mostly not by experts and mostly not in peer-reviewed journals. Just use google scholar and type in positive feedback and CO2: it's not refuted.
BTW, interesting paper on Gore's movie by an actual climatologist: geotest.tamu.edu/userfiles/222/ait.pdf
And good youtube videos on the scientific debate: youtube.com/user/potholer54#grid/user/A4F0994AFB057BB8
Ask me if I do believe in man caused warming,I´d say, ´I don´t know´ ask me if I believe that man influences global warming to a certain degree, I´d say ´yes´. Why? Well this man has shown himself that Co2 and temperature co-relate, they rise and fall together. We have cars now, and a ton more people than ever before on this earth,all adding up to the amount of Co2 produced. Since Co2 and temperature co-relate it is no big step to say that man influences the temperature on earth.
Fangornmmc 3 weeks ago
John is correct. Fred Bailey has discovered the underlying nataural mechanism that regulates Sunspot production and Climate Change, there is a connection between them but Sunspots have nothing to do with Climate Change, Google solarchords and you will see for yourself
howardsway782 5 months ago
@nextdimensions
It was Gore's movie that prompted me to look into the facts for myself.
If CO2 does indeed lag temperature (which the data proves unequivocally) then there is no more debate. Man-caused global warming is an invention of left-wing nut cases, nothing more.
And the solution?? "Carbon tax".
Soooo predictable.
AshtonPhoto 7 months ago
There are still liberals who think the space shuttle is fake and man caused warming is real.
AlSnakeOilGore 7 months ago
@kesav1985 "every season v r witnessing the effect of global warming"
and the sheep says...baaahhhhh
amzuel420 8 months ago
If global warming is a scam, John Coleman is 100% retard. every season v r witnessing the effect of global warming, in d form of heavy rains and increase in temperature and melting ice and increase in sea levels. now this MF John comes and says it is a scam. WTF is wrong with him. he shud be mentally abnormal.
kesav1985 8 months ago
Deniersuse sources like john coleman when coleman has only a TV broadcast background and his college major was in journalism. Is he a respected credible expert? Not hardly!
It's because deniers have no credible sources to support their opinions. Although Wiki isn't a source of scientific information they do provide accurate position statements of the respected scientific institutions. Here's a link.
Google: Scientific Opinion on Climate Change Wiki
and
Google: The Denial Machine Video
ReduceGHGs 9 months ago
Think about this: CO2 isn't the problem the Extra CO2 is the problem. CO2 gets in the air and the gets absorbed by plants it's called the carboncycle
But the extra CO2 that we get in the air by burning oil doesn't take part of the Carbon cycle. It has been taken away from it millions of years ago when it got formed. And now we are releasing in 1 year what has been assimilated to plants/ oil in 400 years. Think about it. The carbon cycle can't handle it.
puzzelstuk2 11 months ago
@dointime85
We'll have to agree to disagree here and leave it at that.
Check your YT inbox.
AshtonPhoto 11 months ago
@AshtonPhoto
"This argument has been disputed quite vigorously." Of course, but mostly not by experts and mostly not in peer-reviewed journals. Just use google scholar and type in positive feedback and CO2: it's not refuted.
BTW, interesting paper on Gore's movie by an actual climatologist: geotest.tamu.edu/userfiles/222/ait.pdf
And good youtube videos on the scientific debate: youtube.com/user/potholer54#grid/user/A4F0994AFB057BB8
dointime85 11 months ago