RE: RE: Evil: God Loves It and You Should Too

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
731 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 2, 2010

Nephilim and his latest fail. The nature of sin. And some words of encouragement.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (kittehprimo)

  • 3. It is a non-contradiction paradox caused by the atheist worldview, not to mention a lack of understanding of the concept of “faith”.

  • @WSSIIWarlordII you lost me at "atheist worldview"

  • @kittehprimo These tiny people are specs of dust on youtube... You should try looking at the high rollers. Dr William Lane Craig, John Lennox. Richard Deem. And other good University apologetic veterans!

  • @WSSIIWarlordII You lost me at "william lane craig"

Video Responses

This video is a response to Evil: God loves it, you should too!
see all

All Comments (142)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @WSSIIWarlordII "These tiny people are specs of dust on youtube... You should try looking at the high rollers. Dr William Lane Craig...."

    *SIGH*

    Since when does a phD in philosophy grant one access to the supernatural?? And Presenting plausible arguments justifying a supernatural creation source DOES NOT equal proof for the "Christian" god! This use of intellectual intimidation is getting old. But if you must you must. I find it amusing how desperate apologists are getting.

  • @kittehprimo Whatever, be angry all your life then.. There more atheist! The better :) World Will Self Destruct soon! :)

  • 1. The Scientific Naturalist claims complete faith in the empirical process, despite the limitations of the process, and the primitive current state of knowledge (lack of existing evidence).

    2. Yet the S.N. decries religion due the use of faith in the process, despite the rational logic and forensic evidence that currently exists in support for that faith.

  • We know it is false because? If we are Naturalists only, then it is false by definition. We have intuited its falseness, even though we have no empirical justification.  We need it to be false, or naturalism is false. We want it to be false. It is our will that there is no free will; a fine paradox.

  • “ The physical world provides no room for freedom of will. (yet) that concept is essential to our models of the mental realm. Too much of our psychology is based on it for us ever to give it up. We’re virtually forced to maintain that belief, even though we know it is false.”

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more