NASA | "Buzz Descends" - Partially Restored Apollo 11 Video
Top Comments
All Comments (34)
-
@insanecat1 Those aren't stars...
-
why are there stars at 0:02?? the moons atmosphere cant illuminate the stars that bright >.> god nasa is RETARTED
-
@muckletoon, sure ! AND WITH A LOT OF OTHER ERRORS IN THEMOON HOAX we can believe securely= any man never went to moon. (Not at least went ahead of 400 km, where begins the mortal space radiation and temperature of 150° C). Who thinks this is crazy, research, dont write shit for me
-
All is a big fake...
-
Fake
-
although the restoration resolved the flickering issue the archive shots have much more clarity. look for example at the tracks under the lander, they look much clearer than in the restored video. maybe it's a work in progress but still, i don't get it
-
Looks like someone painted out picture static frame by frame. Stupid solution. Poor results. We'll see how the final looks...
-
@WillStriveHarder I would've thought they teach you about gravity in the Philippine State College Of Aeronautics.....
-
@visions84 and everyone who says that the original is better: Watch it in HD. They removed all the single-frame specks, adjusted the brightness and contrast, and made quite a few other minute adjustments. They uploaded it in 720p for a reason...
orignal video looks much better then new one
visions84 2 years ago 10
Pause the video about 2 seconds in. The original is about 50x clearer than the "restoration". Is this a joke? The restoration looks like a blurry mess. All the detail from the suit is gone. All the detail from the moon surface is gone. Lame.
AmigaHeretic 1 year ago 7