polaroid is slower, lower quality, and not easily expandable. as well, you have that stupid plast coating around it. this uses zero ink, is just the paper, and can be expanded to any size paper.
the ink costs nothing... there is no ink. the ZINK printers ue zero ink. as well, this is just the tiny printer. the technology expands to any size print, so you could do full poster prints, etc.
I think the idea is meant to be instant prints for digital cameras, not just phones.
magintz 3 years ago
zink will...
tennisRocks08 4 years ago
zink will...
tennisRocks08 4 years ago
polaroid is slower, lower quality, and not easily expandable. as well, you have that stupid plast coating around it. this uses zero ink, is just the paper, and can be expanded to any size paper.
antiaverage1 4 years ago
the ink costs nothing... there is no ink. the ZINK printers ue zero ink. as well, this is just the tiny printer. the technology expands to any size print, so you could do full poster prints, etc.
antiaverage1 4 years ago
why would anyone want to print a tiny picture taken with a phone's camera? the ink must cost a lot too.
mrmistermaster 5 years ago
I wanna know more about this and see how well it prints.
If it prints nice i shall buy one, though the paper is a little expensive being 100 sheets for 20$
Starmie 5 years ago
there is no need for ink, hense the name Zink..Zero Ink.
I wanna know more about this and see how well it prints.
If it prints nice i shall buy one, though the paper is a little expensive being 100 sheets for 20$
Starmie 5 years ago
Wait until they make a camera with built in printer.
Hmm, funny sense of de ja vu
whitEEEE 5 years ago 2
forgive me for not being impressed, but arnt we moving AWAY from a paper society... paper was so LAST centuary :)
stubbulon5 5 years ago