Addressing a typical atheist

As I said, I'm still sick. My fellow Christians, how much do you want to bet atheists will use this 'weakness' as a weapon against me? "Oh, this Christian sounds like he's gonna cry, lol" or "This Christian can't even get through this video without clearing his throat? What a weakling."

Category:

Education

Tags:

• sykeo123
• thunderf00t
• fakesagan
• theamazingatheist
• atheist
• troll
• university
• shockofgod

[87idk]

and no i don't care about pwnage.

what i care about is my education. once i graduate from highschool i want to attend university and get a degree in physcology and after that nursing

[DaMagiCraven]

@87idk What the hell is physcology? Thanks for sharing your personal ambitions with me, though. Good luck with that.

[ReligiousFiction]

There is no typical atheist.

[DaMagiCraven]

@ReligiousFiction Same way that there is no typical Christian. But since atheists seem dead set on being bigots and lumping all Christians into one insulting, simplified, over generalized group, I thought I'd respect your messed up (lack of) beliefs, by returning the favor. Consider it a tribute, flattery by imitation.

[rvbben]

actually, he don't represent me, and we aren't a religious movement. also, we correct others if we see them, sadly your channel and videos are so small that you only are able to get a few viewers, so sorry.also, you wanna talk about persecution, have you ever had the shit beat out of you for being christian? have you ever had a atheist teacher utterly ignore you, leaving it to yourself to research and find answers to pass? have your children ever been laughed at for their beliefs? yeah.

[DaMagiCraven]

@rvbben Actually, he do represent you. That's the rule, a fail from one is a fail from all of you. You're halfway to being a religious movement. You have all the draw backs of a religious movement, just lacking any of the benefit. I love how you try to belittle me for having a small channel, yet according to your channel when you've uploaded videos you've only gotten a grand total of 173 views. Somehow I don't think you're not being entirely honest with your persecution claims either.

[jfrontier1]

@joshbmorrow Sciencism, prove it is the only, (or even the best) way to understand anything, and use the scientific method doing it. "Hence philosophy, and not science, is a stronger candidate for being the very paradigm of rationality.” John Kekes

And yet you claim rationality?

[jfrontier1]

@joshbmorrow And who is the father of qm theory? What did he believe?

Your ideas of presuppositional arguments are nothing but cicular. OK, prove your sciencism is valid. Is science the only form of rational thinking? Prove it using science.

Of course, you again assume that somehow QM theory will disprove God. How so?

[BT3701]

Great video - I totally agree with EVERYTHING you stated. You hit the nail on the head by pointing out the hypocrisy and dishonesty of atheists. No surprise since a recent conducted poll showed that atheists are considered the least trusted of all minority groups.

[joshbmorrow]

@jfrontier1

*Note* science is actually busy right now with quantum-mechanics - Which most certainly concerned with current metaphysical issues. My logic is more valid because I do not use circular reasoning or appeals to experience/anecdotes (Probably about how "oh, I just FEEL god is there. I KNOW him!") - those are fallacious. That's why mine is more valid (note, this doesn't make me right, it just makes you wrong).

Explain yourself sometimes, instead of resorting to adhominem

[joshbmorrow]

@jfrontier1

Explain to me my circular argument. Seriously. Go over my "circular argument." Explain the fallacy that you claim I have made.

Do it.

I have already admitted that we cannot have a Cartesian level of certainty... But it's all we really have.

[jfrontier1]

@joshbmorrow Your presuppositional arguments are the circular argumnets, and yet you do not even get that. Science tries to get answers, but what do you try to do? Nothing.

And thanks for proving the point of this video with your absurd comments to me. Once again atheist total fail. :D

[jfrontier1]

@joshbmorrow Science does not uncover anything of the metaphysical relm. Your sciencism is not a valid idea. My experience is more than naturalism (do not worry, I do not expect you to understand). Why is your logic any more valid because you are a clueless atheist? You practioners of The New Philistinism only prove you have no idea what you are talking about. Thanks for proving your own lazy intellect when talking to me. :D

[joshbmorrow]

@jfrontier1

It's pretty easy to default to: "Well, science doesn't have an answer... So GOD MUST HAVE DONE IT!" (also, this god is Yahweh, and Jesus was his son... I know this because of the bible! CIRCULAR LOGIC!)

Science is honest enough to say: "We don't know the answer... But we're working on... Just look at all the other stuff we've figured out!"

Go back to reading Noah's Ark, and other myths.

[joshbmorrow]

@jfrontier1

Hurr-durr, I see what you did there, with the last sentence. You must feel pretty clever.

If you can tell me any knowledge you've gained from life that didn't come from a combination of experience (naturalism) and Logic... I'd love to hear about it. Seriously. You'd really be the first to have knowledge that didn't come from that combination.

"science of the gaps" - HAH. The difference is that science does it's best to uncover truth. Religion just attributes it to god

[jfrontier1]

@joshbmorrow Fairy Tale? The fairy tale I see is the absurd idea of materialism explaining anything more than the irrational idea that we do not want to believe in God. You mearly worship Science of the Gaps.