2012 5.0 Mustang VS 2012 392 SRT8 Challenger
Uploader Comments (slowcharger)
Top Comments
-
video taken with a cheeseburger... rematch in daylight please!
-
@realfun1232 Actually the 392 pulled up top.
All Comments (35)
-
I meant the challenger is 600-800 mire pounds my bad
-
I mean the challenger is 600-800 more pounds...... My bad
-
I mean the challenger is 600-800 pounds more....... My bad
-
But the mustang is almost 600-800 pounds more than the challenger and the challenger has room and no car can beat the sound of a hemi
-
5.0 fanyboys are out in full force.
-
The 392 Will never be better then the Gt. Lol!
-
@samsaleh22 Then again, the Mustang GT's are around 30k, the srt8's around 45k. The Mustang GT walks all over the Challenger R/T and Camaro SS, and it ties much more expensive m3 which is fairly amazing. Anyway the fact is, in terms of price, the Mustang GT's don't compete with SRT8's, the Boss 302's do. It just so happens you can make a Mustang GT go 10's or even 9's with the money you saved from NOT buying an SRT8 or BMW etc. I like the new Challys, not enough to buy one tho...yet
-
With me the mustang is stronger
-
Holy shit, for the extra 10-15K in price I thought the 392 would absolutly rape the 5.0. What a waste of money.
-
The new 5.0 are low 12 car's ford limited there car now if you change that then its a totally win for the 5.0 that's all the 392 has is top end lol! Joke
I had NOTHING for the 392 up top(125+) I run out of gear. When the SRT pulls it is becuase its faster up top, no question. 1/4 I walked all over. As for the quality there from a friends iPhone.
slowcharger 2 months ago