Creationsm Challenge

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
274 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 14, 2008

Or: Challenge to creationists!

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (jesuriah)

  • i never said it was proof, i stated their was for sure evidence that supported possible cohabitation.

  • Actually no. Nowhere in the comments have you made this statement until THIS(bold text because we don't have italics) comment.

  • yes i did, it's interesting no doubt, i'm sorry if i had misrepresented, i was under the impression that protein was needed to produce the process that allowed carbon dating to work. I understand there are more methods for dating, but there are methods against it to. For instance, i have personally seen an exactly well drawn depiction of a human riding a triceratops made around 1600, before there was any accurate understanding of current description based on study.

  • I've seen pictographs of men with dog's heads, minotaurs, or anything from any ancient mythos.

  • simply because all research i've done shows me for carbon to be present there has to be proteins, but with a half life of 5,700 years and complete dissipation of 50,000 years, we can postulate that it is an unreliable tool for measurement past that time.

  • Proteins are irrelevant to carbon dating. Carbon is required for carbon dating. I find your conlcusion accurate though, but we use more than just carbon dating. Usually specimens are tested using several methods at once, in order to get a more accurate date since Did you get a look at HeLa?

see all

All Comments (65)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • is that resolution inaccurate?

  • How would carbon dating show proteins, and why do you throw up a red flag at carbon dating?

    Yes, I know it is highly improbable, and most(myself included) thought it was impossible to find dinosaur soft tissue, but that's what it appears to be.

  • hold on proteins? proteins in an organism older than say 50,000 years is more than improbable please don't refer to carbon dating

  • Well because of climate and chemistry issues, a complete fossil record is unlikely. It's kind of like a jury requiring a video confession from a murderer, who's blood was found under the victims fingernails and who's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon, you know? I've got to get some sleep.

    Cheers.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more