Asymmetric capacitor operating in high vacuum_v1.wmv

This is a test of an Asymmetric capacitor device similar to a Lifter, but with only one out of its three sides. These test were conducted to show that Asymmetric capacitor devices can and will produce a thrust under a high vacuum in the 10^-6 Torr range. It's not all just Ion wind. Feel free to replicate what you see. This is a real candidate for Breakthrough propulsion physics.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Star trek
• anti gravity
• propellantless propulsion
• propulsion
• science
• technology
• antigravity
• TT brown
• ttbrown
• Biefeld brown
• biefeld
• gravitec
• ufo
• space
• lifters
• lifter
• ion wind
• ion propulsion
• ion drive
• vacuum
• NASA
• Air Force
• warp drive
• call of duty
• science project
• electrogravitics
• electro-gravity
• shangri la

[Atttaturk]

The test object clearly displaces to the left, when voltage is applied, and holds that position. That the object hangs on wires subject to voltage, needs to be considered and a test in Zero G would be better study.

[hec031]

@Atttaturk I agree 100% and we are moving towards an orbital test, but first we have two more test devices that we have to test. The first is a new self powered rotary device, which I just finished tonight and will be testing tomorrow. The second will be a fully vacuum rated self powered rotary device and finally a micro-sat test. If these test all succeed than all bets are off as to what happens next. Our work will become more public later this year.

[UnderManlac]

So, why didn't you build a lifter and test it? This doesn't provide proof of concept whatsoever. This is no better than the motor effect shown in other videos where the capacitor is on a pivot and spinning.

Please make a lifter and test it in a vacuum. I suspect that it will not lift.

[hec031]

@UnderManlac I know a lot of people in the scientific community that disagree with you, but you're entitled to your opinion.

[marcosvelarde83]

what about a "lifter" in the vacuum? its posible?

[MrAwsome514]

@UnderManlac Actually I believe they are capable of understanding the science behind it, however, they have allowed their desire to be right to override their capacity for reason. They want such things as antigravity to be true so strongly that they forget to question it when they believe that they have found it. The key to getting them to come around is not in the information you provide to them but I find it is more often how you provide the information to them.

[UnderManlac]

Why does the device still sit on the bottom of the container if there is anti-gravity going on here? What you have here is an ion thrust device. The only effect, as I have explained to you several times before, is an ion thrust combined with the ion wind effect. My guess is that you can't grasp that concept, or refuse to try to understand it. Instead, you spout off that you are creating anti-gravity but there is NO evidence to suggest that, just your unsupported claim.

[UnderManlac]

@lorenzogemma Again, your video proves nothing. I see no evidence of a high vacuum, judging from the normal look of the lid. Your vacuum chamber is flawed. You could never achieve any significant vacuum in such a container, especially when you have wires running up under the lip of the lid. Air will find a way in if not properly sealed. Those containers are not designed to create a perfect seal. Your video is a total failure if you're trying to prove movement in a vacuum.

[UnderManlac]

@MrAwsome514 They keep on coming in through the woodwork. When we try to educate them and try to make sense of it all for them, they get offensive and calls us shills and such. Never do they consider that we know what we are talking about. The information (the right information) is available on the net for anyone wishing do some research. Yet, they continue their false claims because they do not understand enough about the science behind what they are doing.

[UnderManlac]

@hec031 No duh. I've been telling you that for a long time now. It's ion thrust and ion wind. Nothing more. There is no new science here, no new physics. The ion thrust engine has been in development for decades. I can't see why you refuse to consider that fact. Most people talking about the asymmetric capacitor claim anti-gravity. It has nothing to do with gravity, just thrust from the ions given off and the ion wind that's carried along with it.

[UnderManlac]

@hec031 I know a lot of people in the scientific community that fully agree with me. These people happen to be physicists with doctorates and engineers. Your boast means nothing. I have talked, at length, with highly intelligent people discussing this very subject. I have given them my high voltage experiments book and they draw the same conclusion on this subject very adamantly. No new laws of physics are shown here, no laws of physics are broken. It's not anti-gravity.

[UnderManlac]

@hec031 So when you say, "when done correctly" you are saying, not in a vacuum, but at full atmospheric pressure? This would again lend itself to ion thrust and ion wind effect.