Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

A point about muskets

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,553
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 2, 2011

I'm sure I could have said this in half the time. Never mind - the gist of it is that I think psychology plays a big role in the use of weapons, and perhaps muskets in particular.

www.LloydianAspects.co.uk

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (lindybeige)

  • whats the advantage of a firearm over a crossbow then? They load about as fast as each other, don't they? And I know that it would be a lot easier to train people to use, and loading would be a lot easier in confined spaces.

  • @shoopoop21 It makes ever such a loud bang.

  • @lindybeige That's it? That doesn't sound like such a great advantage over killing power and accuracy.

  • @shoopoop21 Battles are lost by one side's running away, not being killed to a man.

  • i suppose in a small space you couldn't see anything with all the smoke and whatnot

    maybe fumbling to put on the bayonet would take longer than reloading in a panic state

    but then again ones in a panic state- and i don't think the minion troops carried swords for close quarters ....or did they?

    i thought only the cavalry and officers carried swords so...hmm....maybe thats just in movies

  • @1x93cm Depends on the period. All soldiers were issued with swords until long after the advent of the musket period. Many were low-quality "hangers" but they'd still hurt.

see all

All Comments (146)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @shoopoop21 Firearms left MUCH more gruesome wounds than crossbows, but I think the main advantage was that they were cheaper/easier to make. A steel crossbow took a skilled craftsman to construct, but any village blacksmith could make a decent musket or arquebus.

  • @shoopoop21 the range of the musket is far longer according to its slope compared to a crossbow. Also balls are cheaper to produce then bolts. Also a well trained gunner could fire off 3 rounds per minute which is much faster then how some one could crank back a crossbow and then sloping it to compensate. Crossbows without a crank also require a lot of strength where as a musket can be used by anyone with hands

  • Have you ever read "On Killing" by David Grossman? He takes a very interesting and in-depth look at why soldiers have quite often been so ineffective (relatively speaking) at actually killing their opponents.

  • muskets- early flash-bangs ^^

  • This doesn't apply to Caroleans.

  • Hey i study psychology and genetics alot. The answer boils down to a lack of courage. Its far easier to reload and pull a trigger to kill a man than it is to drive your blade through his torso. You'll say to yourself "well he missed me once, so he might miss again". You'll convince yourself of anything so you wont have to use your blade. Its so easy to just press a trigger. Like the pilot who dropped both atomic bombs on japan.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more