Chicago: Funny Honey
Loading...
32,693
Loading...
Uploader Comments (starrinshelby)
Top Comments
-
Her voice is fine, but her acting is lacking.
see all
All Comments (30)
-
@MeetTheMansons But they didn't wear anything like the underwear we wear today.
-
@MALANGA1 he says "pussy" hahaha!
we just watched it and he says he totally remembers that slip-up haha
-
a "great actress" is great in any role.
-
I like her voice, but she doesn't really add enough emotion to it. I bet she's a great actress, but it doesn't seem like this was the role for her.
-
I don't the costume, I think it's a little too revealing, it takes away from the song. She should probably have worn a robe without showing all the underwear.
-
she's got a nice voice, but i don't think it works for this song..
maybe if she song velma's parts?
Loading...
At 3:14 he say's something else other than "floozy" it seems. LOL You can tell he realizes it and tries to keep from cracking up.
MALANGA1 1 year ago
@MALANGA1
LOL I listened and you are RIGHT....lol
starrinshelby 1 year ago
um shouldn't she be wearing, um i don't know...maybe a corset.....and, more period pieces, instead of present "undergarments"? to help add to the time era....
i am just saying...
keirapirate12 3 years ago 7
It's set in the 20's, they didn't wear corsets anymore.
MeetTheMansons 2 years ago
Gosh...uh...thanks for the advice:)
starrinshelby 2 years ago
OOOKKkaay...
starrinshelby 2 years ago