Subjectivity Spawns Science?
Uploader Comments (TheDeLoreanFlux)
Top Comments
-
fukken featured
Video Responses
All Comments (37)
-
:D
-
This... is the best.
Though I can't know that statement is absolutely true.
Probably not... I mean, I've seen better, but damn this was a great video.
-
I remember MY first joint
-
@MatthewHudghton 1+1=1 if you consider the result as one new object. The grass is not green, the colour is the part of the light that the material absorbe. If the ligth of the sun wouldn't have green, the grass should be black. The time has relative existence depend on the observer movement ( Einstein theories). However, the truth exist, but the science never will reach it, because is not its work. The science describe the "how", not the "why".Nevertheless, we still are so young as civilization
-
The objective world can only be known and influenced via subjectivity. Heisenberg knew the dealy-o. Harumph!
-
Pseudo-philosophy aside, whats your point?
-
great vid
-
Energy is the Truth. Energy can't be created or destroyed. Thoughts are energy. Energy operates matter. Matter is nothing without energy. All there is, is energy and matter. Energy is absolute.
-
parts of this video made me laugh
-
Associative Context/
you are really fucking creepy get a fucking life and try to be more of a normal person you homo
Anthonyhord 2 years ago
I raped your mom.
TheDeLoreanFlux 2 years ago 7
heh interesting video, i disagree on ltos but was fun to watch :)
"but truth, absolute truth is always out of reach and completely useless to beleive in" isn't that an absolute statement? and so a touch self refuting :P
MatthewHudghton 3 years ago
I didn't make an absolute statement. It is simply a conclusion made from empirical observation. So there is no self refutation contained.
TheDeLoreanFlux 3 years ago
A conclusion from empirical observation/evidence that says absolute truth doesn't exist?
I think absolute truth defiantly exists, eg.1+1=2 or the grass is green, time exists :P even if we use words to describe them the words themselves aren't the thing that are the subject or being argued, its the objective truths or objects themselves.
I mean isn't a conclusion an objective statement based on evidence?
thanks for the reply , dunno if i make sense lol but yeah see you hope you havea good day
MatthewHudghton 3 years ago
I never said there was absolutely no such thing as absolute truth. I am open to the idea. I just don't see how it is useful to think so. Surely we can use what we think as truth to operate, because that is the best we can do. The closest we can get to absolute truth is knowing what works and what doesn't. Hope this clears up the ambiguity.
TheDeLoreanFlux 3 years ago