Ray Comfort VS Sam Tyler-Smith God/Evolution Debate March 18 2009 Part 3/8
Uploader Comments (BathTubNZ)
Top Comments
-
I just cant listen to Ray for more than a few seconds at a time without getting a face-palm induced headache. Good work Sam:).
-
Ray, Ray, Ray - Where do I start?
How about: ... 1 billion years later a dog evolved and finally had eyes that worked so he could find a mate..? ... Which came first the heart or the blood...?
Do you have any idea how evolution works or are you just being intentionally misleading? Then again - you did think a banana was made by god, so you obviously don't understand the concept of research either.
I give up on you Ray; there is not enough hope or characters allowed to counter your ignorance
All Comments (26)
-
@jagara1 Yeah, Ray is very narcissistic. I've spoken to him before and he'll attack you for not agreeing with him. I'm Catholic and he said I was the wrong faith. He attacked other Christians, and everyone else.
-
@Stitchman3875 I'm guessing you are saying I am making a good point rather than Ray Comfort - if that's the case thank you :)
-
@jagara1 That is actually a good point.
-
Ray Comfort is to intellectual argument what Sarah Palin is to politics - a narcissist who is completely unaware of his intellectual inferiority to the area he talks about...
-
@sportzmusicGod Dude, look it up your own damn self and stop trolling - I got a PhD to write
-
@IronMAidan tell me how its possible for everything to come from nothing. and answer the first two questions u just posted about how the dog found a mate at the same time, same place, and which DID come first, the heart or the blood. Answer those to prove yourself.oh wait.............u cant.
-
So now Ray Comfort is dismissing transitional fossils by pointing to animals he thinks are 'weird'????
The stupidity of this man knows no bounds.
-
@jesusrules2012 And a virgin birth is a proprietary, original idea?
You cant aruge for the existance of a being that exists beyond logic with a logic explaination.
Also, a female who gives birth thru hermaphroditic conception, the offspring will either be female or female with male organs. It will not create a full male.
-
@jesusrules2012 Also, a female who gives birth thru hermaphroditic conception, the offspring will either be female or female with male organs. It will not create a full male.
I thought I heard that presentation before!!! Sam stole it from Dawkins! LOL!!!
jesusrules2012 2 years ago
Really? I have never ever heard that argument from Dawkins. It's not unique to Sam, but I am pretty certain Dawkins has never used it. He's not a bible historian. Sam was however finishing up his thesis on religion at the time. If you have a link to Dawkins using it, I would be very interested. Really it was just a Way for Ray to get off a cheap (meaningless) shot under his breath.
BathTubNZ 2 years ago