@silvermediastudio they rely on those things because they can fit them into what they need, my video shows them doing that 1st hand by trying to make it look like there was almost no fire so they can say "see it had to be explosives because the fires were almost out" the title is "sept 11th the smoking gun" check it out and see how guilty they really are.
@loosechangeexposed Agreed. The 'truthers' rely on first-hand accounts, which unfortunately are not always accurate. People grasp at words to explain what happened, use of hyperbole is likely and comparisons to things they have never experienced in person. How many WTC employees have actually heard an explosive detonate? It isn't like it is in the movies.
And as you say, every sound bite and clip is stripped of its context and put into a different one by the movie maker, a la Michael Moore.
these are the questions that lead me to believe there were no explosives planted, that and the fact that in every controlled demo there is alot of evidence left behind which no one found any, i'm not insisting that you are claiming explosives but these are the questions i asked and never found answers, my video "how the towers fell" has the answers i found.
also in that video is a 2nd sound 9 seconds after the plane crashed (one of the sounds willie heard, he also heard another in the basement) if explosives in a planned demo are tied into a sequence wouldn't they all go off if 2 did so soon after the plane hit or did they go off by accident yet none of the rest went off and the collapses started at the tops so why would anyone set off 2 then wait so long to set off the rest
this is how they claim that thousands of people heard explosions, while the only 2 identified were the 2 planes blowing up, 1 guy could have been on the 75th floor and heard a boom in the elevator shaft which was more than likely an elevator hitting it's bottom, like i said most sounds are still unidentified, the 2 sounds willie heard (my video 9/11 engines down elevator shafts has his testimony)
@silvermediastudio the thing about a controlled demolition at the wtc it is all derived from the 1st reports of people who were there, truther videos have 1 guy who said "i heard an explosion" while they don't include all the details of where he was and at what time, so he could have been walking and heard the plane hit then he looked up, another guy said "it sounded like a bomb went off" they take only parts of testimony
@loosechangeexposed Regarding the detonation of all explosive types by household electricity, you're wrong.
Regarding initiators or explosives in the buildings, I don't believe there were any. I agree with your points, I was merely providing more robust information regarding explosives that do exist, not making a case for explosives being present in the buildings.
@silvermediastudio there are no explosives that can not be detonated by reg. household electricity (110 volts) what do you think radio controlled explosives are set off with at any road construction demolition site? a 9 volt battery. (with roadside signs saying shut off 2 way radios), do you think that every 1 of those initiators were missed by the plane and not 1 of them were found by 1st respondors (who lost friends and almost got killed themselves?) show proof of them found
@loosechangeexposed High voltage or shock tube initiators for explosives are available off the shelf, and are used in fireworks, mining operations and military applications, they have an NSN (National Stock Number). The material runs out the same as standard det cord, and can be set up in the same amount of time with no added complexity or parts. The major differences are a different initiator (same physical dimensions) and a voltage generator, about the size of a deck of cards.
@silvermediastudio in a set up like that it would take way too long to even set it up, it is not a weekend project here is a video i made showing how long it takes to rig a smaller building and the calculations on rigging 267 floors in wtc's 1, 2, and 7
/watch?v=drCByPfStXc
in a set up like that there would be a lot of evidence left all around but none of the 1st responders ever said they found any and they almost got killed
here is the real shape of wtc 7 /watch?v=_7rj5UQvlWw
@silvermediastudio they rely on those things because they can fit them into what they need, my video shows them doing that 1st hand by trying to make it look like there was almost no fire so they can say "see it had to be explosives because the fires were almost out" the title is "sept 11th the smoking gun" check it out and see how guilty they really are.
loosechangeexposed 1 month ago
@loosechangeexposed Agreed. The 'truthers' rely on first-hand accounts, which unfortunately are not always accurate. People grasp at words to explain what happened, use of hyperbole is likely and comparisons to things they have never experienced in person. How many WTC employees have actually heard an explosive detonate? It isn't like it is in the movies.
And as you say, every sound bite and clip is stripped of its context and put into a different one by the movie maker, a la Michael Moore.
silvermediastudio 1 month ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post.
these are the questions that lead me to believe there were no explosives planted, that and the fact that in every controlled demo there is alot of evidence left behind which no one found any, i'm not insisting that you are claiming explosives but these are the questions i asked and never found answers, my video "how the towers fell" has the answers i found.
loosechangeexposed 1 month ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post
also in that video is a 2nd sound 9 seconds after the plane crashed (one of the sounds willie heard, he also heard another in the basement) if explosives in a planned demo are tied into a sequence wouldn't they all go off if 2 did so soon after the plane hit or did they go off by accident yet none of the rest went off and the collapses started at the tops so why would anyone set off 2 then wait so long to set off the rest
cont next post
loosechangeexposed 1 month ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post
this is how they claim that thousands of people heard explosions, while the only 2 identified were the 2 planes blowing up, 1 guy could have been on the 75th floor and heard a boom in the elevator shaft which was more than likely an elevator hitting it's bottom, like i said most sounds are still unidentified, the 2 sounds willie heard (my video 9/11 engines down elevator shafts has his testimony)
cont next post
loosechangeexposed 1 month ago
@silvermediastudio the thing about a controlled demolition at the wtc it is all derived from the 1st reports of people who were there, truther videos have 1 guy who said "i heard an explosion" while they don't include all the details of where he was and at what time, so he could have been walking and heard the plane hit then he looked up, another guy said "it sounded like a bomb went off" they take only parts of testimony
cont next post
loosechangeexposed 1 month ago
@loosechangeexposed Regarding the detonation of all explosive types by household electricity, you're wrong.
Regarding initiators or explosives in the buildings, I don't believe there were any. I agree with your points, I was merely providing more robust information regarding explosives that do exist, not making a case for explosives being present in the buildings.
silvermediastudio 1 month ago
@silvermediastudio there are no explosives that can not be detonated by reg. household electricity (110 volts) what do you think radio controlled explosives are set off with at any road construction demolition site? a 9 volt battery. (with roadside signs saying shut off 2 way radios), do you think that every 1 of those initiators were missed by the plane and not 1 of them were found by 1st respondors (who lost friends and almost got killed themselves?) show proof of them found
loosechangeexposed 1 month ago
@loosechangeexposed High voltage or shock tube initiators for explosives are available off the shelf, and are used in fireworks, mining operations and military applications, they have an NSN (National Stock Number). The material runs out the same as standard det cord, and can be set up in the same amount of time with no added complexity or parts. The major differences are a different initiator (same physical dimensions) and a voltage generator, about the size of a deck of cards.
silvermediastudio 1 month ago
@silvermediastudio in a set up like that it would take way too long to even set it up, it is not a weekend project here is a video i made showing how long it takes to rig a smaller building and the calculations on rigging 267 floors in wtc's 1, 2, and 7
/watch?v=drCByPfStXc
in a set up like that there would be a lot of evidence left all around but none of the 1st responders ever said they found any and they almost got killed
here is the real shape of wtc 7 /watch?v=_7rj5UQvlWw
loosechangeexposed 1 month ago