Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Terry Gilliam criticizes Spielberg and Schindler's List

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
190,999
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 14, 2009

In a TCM interview, the legendary film director Terry Gilliam reveals his opinion on Schindler's List and Spielberg and mainstream Hollywood in general, saying things that most filmmakers, critics and viewers are too scared to express.

He also mentions Stanley Kubrick, compares Kubrick and Spielberg and praises the ending of 2001: A Space Odyssey for its thought-provoking ambiguity.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (MeatTycoon)

  • @macallan30forme Yes! We should kick Gilliam's ass. You go first, I'll be right behind you and totally support you. No, seriously, I will.

  • @mphurwitz Learn to behave, jackass. This is the last warning you'll get from me. Most people would have already long banned your ass by now, so appreciate my kindness, you stupid fucking prick.

Top Comments

  • @macallan30forme Sounds like another noob has just been pwned by Terry Gilliam. :-D

  • STANLEY KUBRICK'S movies are social statement, something to think about.

    TERRY GILLIAM movies are social statement hidden in fantasy realm.

    STEVEN SPIELBERG films are commercial movies.

see all

All Comments (2,037)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @mphurwitz Gilliam is a duce' but i do agree with him in this. I dont hate spielberg, but i never took him seriously

  • I agree with him when he says that Spielberg or Hollywood movies give us "stupid" answers. I mainly think that because most likely it be "stupid" if we had all the answers in life. Life is ambiguous, which makes the ending of Kubrick or Gilliam films so fascinating.

  • @mphurwitz good to know someone agrees with me about jaws because people who do are in worryingly short supply in my opinion.

  • @mphurwitz Apparently, you have a certain problem with reading. I recommend you to either get yourself a pair of glasses or poke your both eyes out with a rusty fork, you child of Josef Fritzl.

    Normally, I would put you through hell of verbal pwnership, but I have neither mood or time for it right now. You're out.

  • @MeatTycoon Sorry, but you're clueless about story-telling. Yes, if Spielberg had done what you suggested it would complicate the movie in a unnecessary way. The film isn't about a dictatorship or politics, so why introduce those elements when they aren't even broached in the four hours that the film runs? Moronic. Go sit down...

  • @MeatTycoon Range is irrelevant. What you're talking about has no place in the story. If he added what you suggest, it would have only served to muddle a very well constructed story about one man's efforts during a horrific time. So what the fuck are you talking about!? Stalinism? What point would that have served in the film? None! Leave the film making to the filmmakers, and stfu.

  • @grubbad42 Thank you for this...thank you. You're so exactly right. It's as if a film that doesn't have some nonsensical, ambiguous element, cannot be of quality. Gilliam's arguments are so far off and arrogant and pretentious I want to punch him. And I'm a huge fan. Brazil is one of my all-time favorite films, but good ol Terry is way off on this one.

  • @mphurwitz don't get too excited kiddo :) i will follow my arsehole path, you follow yours and we even might meet somewhere along the way. oh yeah, and one more thing. i wasn't arguing i was trying to discuss and share something with you lot, but people like you love to take advantage of their anonymity and just mindlessly argue.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more