Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Richard Dawkins interviews creationist John Mackay (Part 2 of 2)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
24,616
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 11, 2009

John Mackay is an Australian young-earth creationist. Richard Dawkins is Richard Dawkins. What more needs to be said?

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,066)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Richard Dawkins is always so civilized and so determined to remain rational in the face of the irrational. His patience is extraordinary.

  • John Mackay came to my university once..only 50 people showed up to hear him LOL

  • A rabbit must eat it's own shit...design...QED

  • @revlooshin

    Whups, I just found out you're one of those Bible-thumping, Book-of-Revelation swallowers.

    Nice attempt at cloaking yourself with reasonable argument and 'public debate', but you're in David Rives' fundamentalist Christian, anti-intellectual, anti-human camp.

    So you lied. Way to go.

  • @revlooshin: "I believe in creation, naturally,... convinced that life and the universe are products of design from a higher mind"

    Bro, you subscribe to creationist dogma. Don't evade--it's silly.

  • @revlooshin

    Again, you're reasserting Creationism and Genesis using different words, reinforcing obsolete anthropocentric dogma. Aristarchus, Copernicus, and Kepler would shake their heads ruefully at you.

    Once more, we all wanna know: what's your theory of how all those fossils got into the ground? Because it seems like you would rather they just not be mentioned.

  • @revlooshin

    See? I predicted that you would employ an elitist superiority to evade argument, and there you go doing it.

    Also, you avoided answering a few direct questions with the general evasion of "I'm not gonna go there."

    To sum up: you profess to be superior, you believe in creationism (you said that, not I), and you won't tell us how you think all those fossils got in the ground.

    You realize "mainstream" science---physics and chemistry--brought about Colecovision, don't you?

  • @MadHighway LOL! You're showing just how conditioned your mind is. You can't relate to what I'm telling you because it goes against everything you've been programmed to believe about the typical believer and his beliefs. So you HAVE to frame the discussion within the context of evolution vs. creationism. That's the ONLY way you can generate an opinion and have something to say. With all due respect, MadHighway, I'm not gonna go there with you. Like I said, to each his own. No hard feelings, bro.

  • @revlooshin

    What's your theory, then, of how all those fossils got into the ground?

  • @revlooshin

    No, you're just stating Creationism and Genesis using different words. Whether aliens or God, you're reinforcing obsolete anthropocentric dogma straight from the Dark Ages.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more