Why killzone 2 graphics suck

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
84,977
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Feb 6, 2009

a comparation with another game with 2 years old

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4,656)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Should of compared it w/ real life images just like you did w/ Crysis.

  • Would you rather play your Gaylo: Reach and your Cock of Doody: Modern Whorefail, little boy?

  • I'm confused.  Why did you use your microwave to edit this?

  • 2005 hardware vs 2007+ hardware

  • Art direction is an excuse for developers that cant make realistic looking games.

    Crysis 2007 still owns any console game graphicaly in 2012.

    Even next gen consoles will struggle to beat Crysis on PC.

  • lol ur comparing a computer game to a ps3 game what a dumb ass

  • Killzone 2 doesn't look bad, guerilla games just wanted that kind of art style, just like crytek went to a more realistic approach. Just because something doesn't look that real in life doesn't mean it looks bad.

  • the graphics in this game are awesome

  • by the looks of it stupidity still doesnt pay taxes ... ^^ a small quote comes to mind , "ever heard fo stylised graphics ? " just because graphics are not ultra realistic it doesnt mean they are not good and are not using the very latest technics ... but i get the feeling im preaching to the water and not the "fish" ...

  • @csdust they did not add art style on purpose it just looks worse because its on a console

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more